What's new
By:

Following Potential 2025 Draftees

SoberasHotRod said:
I haven't looked up the numbers like KqWIN, but anectdotedly this happens every year. People get on here saying that NBA spacing is going to be so good for a player and then it never happens.

I'm pretty sure that improved NBA spacing is negated by improved NBA defense.
Click to expand...

NBA median rim Frequency: 22.8%
NBA median rim FG%: 70.0%
NBA median FTr: 24.3%

Power 6 median rim Frequency: 35.8%
Power 6 median rim FG%: 60.8%
Power 6 median FTr: 33.7%

The NBA does have better spacing. What people are missing is that the clogged toilet offense is clogged for a reason. Whether a player shots 20%, 30%, or 50% of his shots at the rim, he is getting that proportion of shots in an offense that emphasizes attacking the basket even if it results in bad shots at the rim. The NBA runs a more spaced offense where more shots are 3's, less shots are at the rim. The efficiency increases, but the rate does not.

If anyone still thinks that Rim Rate and FT Rate, the simple thing to do is just show where it happens in the NBA. Give real examples of when the improved spacing in the NBA resulted in more shots at the rim. Every single year we mention how this guy or that guy is going to benefit. I am not even saying that the players do not benefit from the NBA style, but the NBA style does not result in more shots at the rim or FT's.
 
KqWIN said:
NBA median rim Frequency: 22.8%
NBA median rim FG%: 70.0%
NBA median FTr: 24.3%

Power 6 median rim Frequency: 35.8%
Power 6 median rim FG%: 60.8%
Power 6 median FTr: 33.7%

The NBA does have better spacing. What people are missing is that the clogged toilet offense is clogged for a reason. Whether a player shots 20%, 30%, or 50% of his shots at the rim, he is getting that proportion of shots in an offense that emphasizes attacking the basket even if it results in bad shots at the rim. The NBA runs a more spaced offense where more shots are 3's, less shots are at the rim. The efficiency increases, but the rate does not.

If anyone still thinks that Rim Rate and FT Rate, the simple thing to do is just show where it happens in the NBA. Give real examples of when the improved spacing in the NBA resulted in more shots at the rim. Every single year we mention how this guy or that guy is going to benefit. I am not even saying that the players do not benefit from the NBA style, but the NBA style does not result in more shots at the rim or FT's.
Click to expand...
I'm guessing it wouldn't be possible/easy to segregate out this data for guards?
 
KqWIN said:
NBA median rim Frequency: 22.8%
NBA median rim FG%: 70.0%
NBA median FTr: 24.3%

Power 6 median rim Frequency: 35.8%
Power 6 median rim FG%: 60.8%
Power 6 median FTr: 33.7%

The NBA does have better spacing. What people are missing is that the clogged toilet offense is clogged for a reason. Whether a player shots 20%, 30%, or 50% of his shots at the rim, he is getting that proportion of shots in an offense that emphasizes attacking the basket even if it results in bad shots at the rim. The NBA runs a more spaced offense where more shots are 3's, less shots are at the rim. The efficiency increases, but the rate does not.

If anyone still thinks that Rim Rate and FT Rate, the simple thing to do is just show where it happens in the NBA. Give real examples of when the improved spacing in the NBA resulted in more shots at the rim. Every single year we mention how this guy or that guy is going to benefit. I am not even saying that the players do not benefit from the NBA style, but the NBA style does not result in more shots at the rim or FT's.
Click to expand...
I mean, idk how much of this is good data for what we are discussing because NBA teams shoot a ton more 3's than college teams do.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
I mean, idk how much of this is good data for what we are discussing because NBA teams shoot a ton more 3's than college teams do.
Click to expand...

It is the exact data that would determine if the percentage of shots at the rim and free throw rate gets higher or lower. More 3's means less shots elsewhere. It should not be surprising that the rim rate decreases. It should be surprising that a player shoots more at the rim in the NBA when they shoot more 3's. This is why I have said over and over that these two numbers get lower, not higher. Why would you shoot more at the rim or FT line in a league where that shoots less?

But like I said, if you disagree with anything. Just look at the players themselves. Pick 20 random players. See if their rim rate and free throw rate increased or decreased.
 
Last one... maybe... prolly not. Brooklyn offers 8, 19, and a 2029 NYK pick for 5 because Ace is left and they want him BAD. In this scenario Kon is also available at 8.
 
Elizah Huge said:
To be quite honest trading down from 5 is about the last thing I’m looking to do right now.
Click to expand...
I'm just looking at everything. One of the most successful trades of Ainge's career is moving down because he found a guy he was higher on than a couple other teams. He also did it to Philly later in the draft another time and split the asset for a few different purposes.

I think there is also a scenario where a straight 5/Lauri for 2/contracts is available... and possibly you could do 6 (or 7-8) in place of 5 and get an additional asset.

I'm just looking at it all.
 
Basketball Novice said:
Yup, I would do it. Kon is great at 8.
Click to expand...
I think that package could get Brooklyn all the way up to #3 without us potentially. An unprotected 2029 Knicks pick is actually a really good asset imo. They are now fully leveraged into their current team and all the principles will be 31-32ish at that time and the team will be really expensive... plus playing Thibs minutes.

If I knew Kon was there I'd pull the trigger for sure.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top