Handlogten's Heros
Well-Known Member
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
2025 Prediction Contest Winner
I find it interesting that Kon is dismissed as the rim stuff won't work... when he actually did get there and actually did have success there. With other guys that didn't get there as much and didn't have as much success when they got there. cough - Tre - cough
Before we blame Tre's terrible Texas team... This is something he struggled with in HS.
View: https://x.com/slipthescreen/status/1830752589140390294
I don't hate Tre at all... I just think Kon belongs in the VJ/Ace/Tre group. Its weird to me that Kon is dismissed as low upside when honestly... all are looking like they project as role players more than stars.
explain?
Right... but he just didn't do it often because he wasn't really asked to... or maybe he wasn't good at it and that is why. I think all these guys have warts but Kon is "low upside" because of how he looks and that he has stubby arms.I could say the exact same thing but opposite about off the dribble shooting stuff.
Kon had the privilege of playing off of Flagg and with a PnR big like Maluach.
I haven't seen much on the post game stuff. Just that he gets to the paint and finishes at a good rate... whether of pump and go or coming off handoffs or while doing the PnR stuff. Not sure of the other guys you are thinking of when it comes to the "these guys actually did it".I feel like Kon is getting so much credit for this theoretical PnR game and also post up game. Sometimes it feels like more credit than the guys who actually did those things and were good at them. And maybe he is as good or better than them at doing it....but some credit needs to be given to the guys who did it.
Kon is a baller.This year... its Kon
I haven't seen much on the post game stuff. Just that he gets to the paint and finishes at a good rate... whether of pump and go or coming off handoffs or while doing the PnR stuff. Not sure of the other guys you are thinking of when it comes to the "these guys actually did it".
100%. I haven't really seen that too much out there.There's a lot of talk about how Kon can get into the mid-range with his body, etc.—and I’m all for that. I’ve been saying throughout this draft cycle that guys can scale up. But we should remember we’re still talking about a theoritcal player . Take Kas vs. Kon in terms of shot creation and PnR. Kas was almost entirely self-created this year, and he was damn good + efficient at it. Yet Kon seems to get just as much, if not more, credit for what he might be able to do in those areas. Kas was in the 1st percentile for spot up volume, and while I think he can shoot well on catch-and-shoots, assuming he's as good as Kon there feels like a stretch, right?
I don't think Kon can be as on ball as Kas. Part of my issue with Kas is the really high bar to be a primarily on ball guy. I think because Kon basically played the role you could expect him to have in the NBA and he was amazing at it... at a high level... I feel more comfortable that there is a good base to build from.And just to be clear, I’m not saying Kon doesn’t have potential. But when people talk about Kas, the focus is often on why his game won't translate because of X, Y, Z. That’s fine and a lot of those questions are fair. The issue is, you can’t even make those same criticisms about Kon because he didn’t attempt those things. So we end up with this overly optimistic view of theoretical Kon and a pessimistic view of actual Kas.