Tyrese Proctor is a guy I've always liked (since his Freshman year). My problem with him is that I've always liked him better on film than on paper. With so few guys that I like in this draft I think he's someone I can start making excuses for.
- His shot definitely looked way better this year. You can tell he has spent time working on it. I thought his improved % was most likely due to easier looks playing on a stacked team, and that probably played in to it, but he was still taking off the dribble/step back shots and maintained a 40.5% 3pt fg%. For some reason his ft% dropped this year which causes his shooting projections to not be amazing, but he did shoot 87% ft% his Freshman year.
- His main negative is as a point guard who only averaged 2.7ast/36min, but that was obviously scheme and situation this year. He was playing with a lot of other ball handlers and had to share responsibilities. Last year he averaged 4.4 assists and he had a 2.85ast/to ratio which I think is a better indication of what he can do. He is visibly a good ball handler, and not an amazing or creative passer, but gets the job done.
- The other thing I personally look for is stocks and rebounds where he is disappointing. I've heard him being discussed as a good defender, but is only averaging about 2stocks/36min. I think the film on him is solid. He's an above average man defender and can generally stay in front of his guy and is a good screen navigator. He works on that end and is engaged. He's just not a difference making defender and isn't doing a lot off ball.