seattlejazzfan
Well-Known Member
his legs are tree trunks.
Very solid board. Only thing I can’t really see is Fleming over Ace tbh.This is where I am at today. I only went as far as I care about. If I didn't name them, I am ambivalent on them as of today.
-Flagg
-Harper
-Essengue
-VJ
-Tre
-Kon
-Fleming
-Ace
-Fears
-CMB
-Penda
-Egor
-Jace
-Yang
-Thiero
-Clayton Jr
-Traore
-Coward
-Wolf
How does adjusting for SOS work?
I'm not 100% sure which is why I posted the raw numbers first.
I believe they are calculating the offensive and defensive efficiency of the lineups you play against and averaging them out. It makes sense for a guy like Boogie Fland who played mostly against non conference teams, and then his team played the majority of their SEC schedule without him. His On/Off looks amazing, but the adjusted On/Off looks closer to what you would expect. For a guy like Tre Johnson, who was healthy the whole year, I don't understand how the level of competition he faces was so much more difficult with him on the court than with him off the court.
I mean, the board is staying pretty consistent, Im just moving individuals up/down as I look at certain players that I overlooked due to preconceived bias.
For Riley, like I said earlier with Illinois, I watched them a lot early and barely at all in the last few months. I just think he has more upside than most non-lottery guys due to his size/handle/shot creation upside.
Essnegue is probably the next guy I will give a somewhat significant bump to.
Thanks, I get it now. Basically his off numbers are mostly worthless since it is primarily garbage time.They calculate a weighted average based on the lineups played against. Tre played nearly every minute except during games against weaker opponents, so the strength of schedule (SOS) for the minutes he actually played is very high. In contrast, the SOS during the minutes he sat is much lower, since those minutes mostly came against weaker competition. The analysis is granular to the minute level, not just at the game level.
You could say this got me in trouble with Shep last year (I still believe!), but Kon's numbers without Flagg are pretty promising. SSS of course, but he maintains a really high scoring efficiency and his AST/TOV becomes elite. At the very least, it's what you'd want to see if you were hoping to see him scale up.
What do you mean?In the same way that some of Tre's/Ace's mid range highlights double as lowlights, some of Kon's rim finishing makes could double as lowlights.