What's new
By:

Following Potential 2025 Draftees

KqWIN said:
Drafting a wing who isn't good at shooting or defense is probably not a good idea in the first place, but Riley has a lot of areas where he has potential and could improve. Nothing good yet, but seems to be a high feel guy at least.

I've struggled to find comparisons to him as a prospect or as a pro. All around wing sound nice, but who even is an all around wing that isn't a star? Rui? Tobias? Levert?
Click to expand...

If he fills out and becomes a solid shooter, maybe Cam Johnson.
 
Which players had as bad of a steal rate as Will Riley plus as bad of a block rate and as bad as general defensive performance and turned out well.

The returns on Cody Williams after his horrific defensive season in college have not been good and Riley might somehow have been worse on defense in college. At the very least, his arms are much shorter.
 
Last year I put together a mock draft where participants represented teams instead of picks with the idea that you could trade picks that way. Did people like that and would be interested in doing it again, or do people prefer a traditional mock draft of just getting through the picks?
 
SoberasHotRod said:
These Ace Bailey On/Off numbers definitely fly in the face of the idea that he was just an empty calories player.
Click to expand...

The rest of the team is pretty bad. Ace is one of the tallest on the roster and the best rim protector on the team (according to block numbers). If you have Ace holding it down as the best big on the roster, the roster is pretty horrific. That is why I am not sure if the rebounding numbers are real. He won't get as many with an actual decent big on the floor. I don't know how good Sommerville was for Rutgers but the numbers don't look good for him and he only player 20 minutes a game.

I only mention this to point out that on/off numbers are tricky to interpret.
 
Do I have to believe Kas can become an on ball creator in the NBA to see his value?

Im looking at him vs Kon and I struggle to see where he clearly beats Kon... unless I predict that one can operate as an offensive engine and the other cant.

But I dont think either one can.
 
HermanG said:
Do I have to believe Kas can become an on ball creator in the NBA to see his value?

Im looking at him vs Kon and I struggle to see where he clearly beats Kon... unless I predict that one can operate as an offensive engine and the other cant.

But I dont think either one can.
Click to expand...

We don’t really know what Kas looks like in a scaled down role because he’s one of the highest self creating players in the draft. But generally it’s easy to scale back than to scale up (though both happen) and he has a lot of great role player intangibles. I don’t think you’re wrong that Kon looks better if we’re not considering either an offensive engine. Kon as he is ahead of theoretical scaled back Kas, but I don’t really see Kas as worthless in a scaled down role.

But the advantage Kas has is that his offensive engine stuff isn’t all theoretical and he actually performed well in that role. You may not believe much in either’s ability to be a leading ball handler, but one guy actually did it which would be the argument for Kas. Would be hard to argue that Kon has proven more as an initiator.

I think both guys will play more like the other at the next level.
 
Last edited:
The main thing I’ve changed my opinion on in the last few days is that I’m more inclined to trade up for VJ than Harper. Haven’t put VJ ahead of Harper, but I the cost benefit analysis makes me lead towards trading for #3.

So far I’ve done a ton of condensed game watching and more recently diving deep into the stats word. Both of those areas are super favorable to VJ, so I’m probably a bit biased rn. As the draft gets closer I’ll have to switch over to full games and see if that holds. I have a feeling that full game film is not going to be as kind to VJ.
 
KqWIN said:
We don’t really know what Kas looks like in a scaled down role because he’s one of the highest self creating players in the draft. But generally it’s easy to scale back than to scale up (though both happen) and he has a lot of great role player intangibles. I don’t think you’re wrong that Kon looks better if we’re not considering either an offensive engine. Kon as he is ahead of theoretical scaled back Kas, but I don’t really see Kas as worthless in a scaled down role.

But the advantage Kas has is that his offensive engine stuff isn’t all theoretical and he actually performed well in that role. You may not believe much in either’s ability to be a leading ball handler, but one guy actually did it which would be the argument for Kas. Would be hard to argue that Kon has proven more as an initiator.

I think both guys will play more like the other at the next level.
Click to expand...
Thanks.

I'm also seeing he ranked 5th in all of college basketball for total turnovers. Any chance you can detail where those came from a bit? Was it heavy on passing, getting stripped, travelling, offensive fouling or even across the board?
 
KqWIN said:
The main thing I’ve changed my opinion on in the last few days is that I’m more inclined to trade up for VJ than Harper. Haven’t put VJ ahead of Harper, but I the cost benefit analysis makes me lead towards trading for #3.

So far I’ve done a ton of condensed game watching and more recently diving deep into the stats word. Both of those areas are super favorable to VJ, so I’m probably a bit biased rn. As the draft gets closer I’ll have to switch over to full games and see if that holds. I have a feeling that full game film is not going to be as kind to VJ.
Click to expand...
Harper will be all NBA VJ is like the Thompson twins but smaller and less skilled
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top