You are assuming that the Pacers and Bulls wanted IT. I doubt it.But if that were true why not trade for Butler or George, both who went for less than Kyrie?
You are assuming that the Pacers and Bulls wanted IT. I doubt it.But if that were true why not trade for Butler or George, both who went for less than Kyrie?
IT was never the main piece, the pick was.You are assuming that the Pacers and Bulls wanted IT. I doubt it.
the hard part for me was that Chris Paul showed a little respect for the clips and got a SnT done. Hayward could have said something similar and just got Hayward for Crowder and they could still have Avery Bradley on the team.
IT was never the main piece, the pick was.
I guess could argue, especially now, that Oladipo and Sabonis > Cleveland pick (though who knows what happens tomorrow), but at the time the pick seemed way better. I'd still argue the pick > LaVine/Dunn too.
What about a trade exception? That would not have hurt Celtics in anyway.Hi, Danny, I'm Gordon, I'll only join the Celtics if you do a SNT with Crowder. I know this may not be what is in the Celtic's best interest, but sorry, those are my terms. I' m willing to jeopardize the opportunity to play for my chosen team in order to respect the Jazz. Take it or leave it.
Please join us in the real world.
The CP3 situation was completely different. If the SNT was not in the interest of both teams, CP3 could not have made it happen, and it certainly had nothing to do with how much he respected the Clippers.
I mean, any team would have taken IT's salary on. It was only 8 million dollars.You think the Celtics do the deal without unloading IT? I think they wanted to get that era behind them and avoid major issues when IT's health recovered. I could be wrong, but I think this was important to Ainge. They would have had to give up someone else to match salaries, no?
What about a trade exception? That would not have hurt Celtics in anyway.
What about a trade exception? That would not have hurt Celtics in anyway.
Only reason he wont is that it will make it difficult to recruit other free agents. Tatum will be the better player within two years.
I mean, any team would have taken IT's salary on. It was only 8 million dollars.
The Bulls gave up the 16th pick in 2017 and Jimmy Butler to get Zach LaVine, Lauri Markkanen and Kris Dunn ffs. You can't tell me the Cleveland pick isnt better than Zach LaVine, Lauri Markkanen and Kriss Dunn.
I'm really confused why you keep saying they dont give up IT.But if they don't give up IT (expendable, expiring), they have to give up someone else (who they want to keep) to match KI's salary, no?