What's new
By:

Ford's Mock Draft 3.0

I was the only one that hated the Hayward pick besides everyone but Honz and the bleary-eyed embarrassments. But I'm happy to be wrong that he's an NBA player. But that he is one is not due to being a specimen.
 
Was Hayward considered unathletic? Athleticism is one of Hayward's strengths.
 
Siro said:
Was Hayward considered unathletic? Athleticism is one of Hayward's strengths.
Click to expand...

Hayward wasn't and still isn't particularly athletic. He's an exceptionally smart player that works exceptionally hard, but is pedestrian by NBA standards.
 
NUMBERICA said:
I was the only one that hated the Hayward pick besides everyone but Honz and the bleary-eyed embarrassments. But I'm happy to be wrong that he's an NBA player. But that he is one is not due to being a specimen.
Click to expand...

I am happy you are wrong too. I hope he continues developing like he is. He could be top five of all time jazz guys.
 
Strutter said:
What's funny about wanting Monroe? I'm confused.
Click to expand...

Maybe it is the team he is on but he is not efficient at all for a big man. Sure he can pass but... plus i'd rather have Hayward and if we would have drafted Monroe, that means no Kanter, I imagine. If so, We would have had Sap, AL, Favors, Kanter, and Monroe.
 
Batman said:
Maybe it is the team he is on but he is not efficient at all for a big man. Sure he can pass but... plus i'd rather have Hayward and if we would have drafted Monroe, that means no Kanter, I imagine. If so, We would have had Sap, AL, Favors, Kanter, and Monroe.
Click to expand...

dude, Monroe is good. That is all.
 
Batman said:
You may be right. I think he may be overrated. that's all.
Click to expand...

well, at this point, he is better than Favors and Kanter. So he may be overrated, but that just means that we way over rate our bigs. Not saying that Favors and Kanter don't have the potential to be better, but they have to get there first.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top