What's new

Free Agent Rumors Thread

Whoops... So G-time's agent did a good job. Is 4/65 that much more damaging than 4/52? I see the Jazz matching this and Jazzfanz melting.

While I think 4/48 is too much, it's reasonable, assuming the cap continues to go up each of the next few years. If that deal is front-loaded as well, even better.
 
Alright I'm good... clearly this isn't a place where you can have a differing opinion than the herd. When we match Hayward's deal this place is gonna suck anyway... Peace.

Really? There has been good discussion here. We liked having you and hope you stay.
 
Off the bench with Trey?

Exum trey
Burks bazemore
Hood

It's a little crowded if we keep Hayward.

[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];862020 said:
Is this post making the assumption that Hayseed is gone? Do you have a problem with Hay at SF?

Yes. My point was signing Bazemore is not a cheap substitute for Hayward. Gordon CAN play SF. He played alongside Burks last season once Corbin decided to put the core5 in the lineup together late in the season. Subtract Hayward and the Jazz still need another SF.
 
Crowded at the 1/2, but only Hood can play SF.

Bazemore can play a little SF as he has a 6'11 wingspan. Hood and Hayward only have a 6'8 wingspan. I know that is only a minor part but it still helps. He played SF on the Lakers a bit.
 
Yes. My point was signing Bazemore is not a cheap substitute for Hayward. Gordon CAN play SF. He played alongside Burks last season once Corbin decided to put the core5 in the lineup together late in the season. Subtract Hayward and the Jazz still need another SF.
Marvin
 
If we're trying to re-create what the Spurs do, what about Diaw who's unrestricted? It's sort of a hypocritical proposition by me since I've said we need to throw our young guys into the fire at 30+ minutes a night but Diaw would be very interesting here in helping teach the system, wouldn't break the bank, and could be the vet presence we need.
 
Back
Top