What's new

Game 3 Thread: 6:30 PM MT Time

There is nothing to disagree or agree with. I'm right. It's not an opinion, it's a fact.

If the playoffs are a storyline, then the Finals are the end of the story. If the ending is great, then you can't call the story "anti-climatic". There is nothing to argue.
There is though. If a tv show sucks until the finale then I quit watching and consider it a crappy show. If a movie sucks for an hour and a half and then the last 15 minutes are good then it's a crappy movie to me. Plus we don't even know if the finals will be good or not. That's not a fact as it hasn't happened yet. It's a hypothesis, an assumption.

Agree to disagree.
 
Where would we be right now if George Hill, Rodney Hood, Derrick Favors and Joe Ingles played up instead of down?
And Lyles ingles and burks. We will be better next year. Booker it.



We got the worst injury wise and performance wise from many of our guys yet still won 50+ games and got the 2nd round and battled against one of the best teams of all time.

2 more first round picks next year too.

Future is bright
 
There is though. If a tv show sucks until the finale then I quit watching and consider it a crappy show. If a movie sucks for an hour and a half and then the last 15 minutes are good then it's a crappy movie to me. Plus we don't even know if the finals will be good or not. That's not a fact as it hasn't happened yet. It's a hypothesis, an assumption.

Agree to disagree.

Holy **** did you even bother reading what I wrote?
 
There is though. If a tv show sucks until the finale then I quit watching and consider it a crappy show. If a movie sucks for an hour and a half and then the last 15 minutes are good then it's a crappy movie to me. Plus we don't even know if the finals will be good or not. That's not a fact as it hasn't happened yet. It's a hypothesis, an assumption.

Agree to disagree.

I think he's just objecting to the use of the term "anti-climatic", which means you were disappointed by the climax of the playoffs.
 
Holy **** did you even bother reading what I wrote?
You said the finals will be great.

A. Even if they are I don't consider 7 great games and 60 crappy ones "great playoffs"
B. The finals might suck too. They haven't happened yet.
 
I don't feel like **** after this loss, so that's a win.
 
I think he's just objecting to the use of the term "anti-climatic", which means you were disappointed by the climax of the playoffs.
Fair enough. We don't know if they will be anticlimactic yet or not. We just know that the majority of the playoff will suck.

I like reading books, watching TV shows, and movies (not to mention sports)

If only the final part is climactic then the whole thing sucked overall imo and that is the issue.
 
You said the finals will be great.

A. Even if they are I don't consider 7 great games and 60 crappy ones "great playoffs"
B. The finals might suck too. They haven't happened yet.

Please read what I wrote. Focus carefully because I covered all of this. Holy ****.
 
We did good with turn overs. But man bad shooting this whole series really killing us.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Please read what I wrote. Focus carefully because I covered all of this. Holy ****.
No thanks. Make things clearer. I keep reiterating my point. You can too.
 
Back
Top