What's new
By:

George Hill is a G

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
dalamon said:
my hope is that you've halted them altogether after realizing how ****ing bizarre you come across while typing them
Click to expand...

You're lying again.

The most interesting element here is that you can't seem to forget those analyses. It's fair to allege that they struck a serious chord for you. It seems like they revealed something.


But, never mind. Please commence with your bet hedging. You've got an image to patch up.
 
NAOS said:
You're lying again.

The most interesting element here is that you can't seem to forget those analyses. It's fair to allege that they struck a serious chord for you. It seems like they revealed something.


But, never mind. Please commence with your bet hedging. You've got an image to patch up.
Click to expand...

d'aww I'm lying? About what, hun.


Tbh dont remember any of the content, I just remember laughing at sure of yourself you sounded (recurring NAOSpergers theme on teh JFC), and being mystified with why you were typing them up in the first place. You're weird, braugh
 
Another thread turned into nothing but a cry fest between NAOS and Dalamon.

Awesome...
 
dalamon said:
Or it reflects fanbase/staff pressure to pursue one of the only good two-way guards without injury concerns on the market. Is Mike Conley a superstar? How many levels better is Mike Conley than George Hill realistically speaking? Compare their production so far this season
Click to expand...

I don't think this is the first place where you've heard the Conely deal was ridiculous.

And he was 27 when he signed his deal - big difference.
 
candrew said:
I don't think this is the first place where you've heard the Conely deal was ridiculous.

And he was 27 when he signed his deal - big difference.
Click to expand...

Good point on the age difference. I guess it remains to be seen-- if the Knicks whiff on Jrue Holiday do you really think they wont throw at least 20 million a year at George?
 
candrew said:
I don't think this is the first place where you've heard the Conely deal was ridiculous.
Click to expand...

I'd rather have to trade away a late first to get out of Hill's contract(if we have to)than take a huge step back. I don't think Hayward signs if we don't commit to Hill. I don't think this is a Hill or Hayward question.

I also think Hill's game will age well. He relies on length(that isn't going away), he's a good shooter, and he plays smart.
 
♪alt13 said:
I'd rather have to trade away a late first to get out of Hill's contract(if we have to)than take a huge step back. I don't think Hayward signs if we don't commit to Hill. I don't think this is a Hill or Hayward question.

I also think Hill's game will age well. He relies on length(that isn't going away), he's a good shooter, and he plays smart.
Click to expand...

Nah man, he really throws his body around sometimes. I could see him have injury problems down the road-- but his strengths themselves will probably stay intact.

I can't see Hill staying with us while Dante is on a rookie deal unless Hill gives us a serious hometown discount. Add up the contracts yourself-- where are you going to make room for Favors and Hayward and a bench?
 
dalamon said:
Nah man, he really throws his body around sometimes. I could see him have injury problems down the road-- but his strengths themselves will probably stay intact.

I can't see Hill staying with us while Dante is on a rookie deal unless Hill gives us a serious hometown discount. Add up the contracts yourself-- where are you going to make room for Favors and Hayward and a bench?
Click to expand...

IIRC the luxury tax threshold wil be something like 120 million next year. Don't get too caught up on the cap. We can go over it we just can't sign FA's. Unless we have a legitimate shot at acquiring a better player in FA(doubtful) the FO should be willing to exceed the cap to retain our players.
 
♪alt13 said:
IIRC the luxury tax threshold wil be something like 120 million next year. Don't get too caught up on the cap. We can go over it we just can't sign FA's. Unless we have a legitimate shot at acquiring a better player in FA(doubtful) the FO should be willing to exceed the cap to retain our players.
Click to expand...

I dunno. It'll be hard to compete with teams with zero logjams and deep pockets, to be quite honest. George is a vet too so the "max" for him will be higher than some of the others we've seen.

I obviously prefer more talent than less, but every championship team has depth.
 
Pretty sure teh Spurs are going to send a max at George Hill. Pretty sure Hill still lives there in the off-season too.
 
dalamon said:
Nah man, he really throws his body around sometimes. I could see him have injury problems down the road-- but his strengths themselves will probably stay intact.

I can't see Hill staying with us while Dante is on a rookie deal unless Hill gives us a serious hometown discount. Add up the contracts yourself-- where are you going to make room for Favors and Hayward and a bench?
Click to expand...

Hill can't give us a hometown discount bruh. Lern ur terms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top