What's new

Getting to know Earl Watson

NUMBERICA

Well-Known Member
2022 Award Winner
NBA Scouting Reports, Northwest Division (Part Five)
October 24, 2008
Overview: A valuable asset at the point guard position due to his quickness, playmaking and all-around versatility. Tough to stay in front of due to his first step and speed. Lack of size hurts him a bit, but is tough and extremely crafty to make up for that. Possesses a 6-7 wingspan, which comes in very handy. Can do some damage in transition. One of the best in the league at racking up assists. A very solid shooter with his feet set or off the dribble from mid-range. Works hard on both ends. Picks up a decent amount of rebounds for a point guard. Put together a nice career at UCLA, and has steadily improved in the NBA. Was known as a great defender, which is something he has gotten away from a bit recently. May be a bit under the radar at this point due to his lack of playoff success. Brings some nice skills to the table in Seattle, but could be a tremendous role player on a contender.

Offense: Gets most of his offense as a ball handler in pick and roll and transition situations. Does a decent amount of scoring, but is also one of the league’s top-10 point guards statistically. Possesses a consistent shooting stroke with his feet set, particularly from mid-range, but also from beyond the arc. Won’t take many threes, but definitely can, as he proved earlier in his career. Will punish defenders who go underneath the screen on the pick and roll. Takes the vast majority of his jumpers off the dribble. Hits pull ups with very good consistency. Likes to attack the rim when he puts the ball on the floor. Isn’t always able to finish due to his lack of size and strength, but is very crafty around the hoop. Does a very good job turning the corner on pick and rolls and breaking his man down off the dribble. Won’t go to the line very often, and shoots a surprisingly low percentage considering his shooting touch. Good ball handler with his right hand, but is a bit too turnover prone at times. Struggles going left. Brings a lot to the table as a distributor. Seems to have improved year by year in that regard with added maturity and experience. Does a good job drawing defenders and deferring to teammates. Great passer off the pick and roll. Pretty unselfish and creative when he has to get the ball to his teammates.

Defense: An average defender who lacks the size and strength to make an impact on many nights. Capable of putting good pressure on the ball, but doesn’t appear to put as much effort into this end of the floor as he once did. Lack of size makes him susceptible to post-ups and pin-downs, and allows bigger players to shoot over the top of him with ease. Struggles fighting through screens at times. Displays very quick hands in the passing lanes.
From DraftExpress.com https://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Earl-Watson-4787/#ixzz107pet1sv

When this was written, Watson was coming off of a campaign where he scored 10.7 PPG in 29 MPG shooting 37% from 3, and dishing out 6.8 APG (against 2.2 TOs per game [greater than 3 to 1 ratio which is awesome]). His shooting in the last two seasons has gotten progressively worse and I'm hoping that doesn't mean it's a trend that will continue or a consequence of age (he just turned 31). Good shooting isn't supposed to leave a player with age, so it's very possible he gets those numbers back up. Also, the guy's fiery and there's a chance he'll have a chip on his shoulder after having gotten so little attention this offseason in contrast to what was really a decent year (outside of his 3 point shooting). Even a poor shooting Watson is better than Cinderella Gaines or Ronnie Feast-But-Usually-Famine Price. His prowess off-the-dribble isn't likely to last if it isn't gone already from age, but we'll see.

Also, this is kind of fun.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1hf9lW_-_s

I'd be curious to see some of his situation/synergy stats and how he stacks up to other points and himself in past years, but I don't know how to access those. If anyone does, please chip in. I assume Locke will be on that and have something up tomorrow, though.
 
P.S. Channing Frye is the biggest bitch in the NBA. Shoving the littlest guy on the court in the BACK of the head. Classic. Also, Danny Granger is a complete bad ***.
 
P.S. Channing Frye is the biggest bitch in the NBA. Shoving the littlest guy on the court in the BACK of the head. Classic. Also, Danny Granger is a complete bad ***.

Right? Why dont the big guys on the Jazz have any balls? We need Greg Foster and Antoine Carr back.
 
Over/Under 14 MPG for Watson?

Under, but just barely. Williams played 36.9 minutes/game last year. If we have a more reliable backup PG, I bet Williams plays 35 minutes. I don't think we'll see Watson or Williams play the 2 very much, and I have a feeling if Williams plays the two Price may be playing PG in those rare situations. I have nothing to back that up with, just a gut feeling.
 
Under, but just barely. Williams played 36.9 minutes/game last year. If we have a more reliable backup PG, I bet Williams plays 35 minutes. I don't think we'll see Watson or Williams play the 2 very much, and I have a feeling if Williams plays the two Price may be playing PG in those rare situations. I have nothing to back that up with, just a gut feeling.
Sloan did play Maynor and Williams together a little bit, with Deron sliding over to the 2. I could see the Jazz going with a 2 PG offense at times - if they signed Watson. I think a lot depends on how many minutes Raja can go and how many minutes Hayward plays - and injuries, of course. Also depends on the play of Elson and Fesenko. If one or both can be effective until Okur returns, then AK will not be playing PF behind Millsap.

Having a veteran PG would certainly increase roster flexibility. And Utah might be able to win if/when Deron misses a couple of games.
 
Not to be mr technicality, but that article you posted is 2 years old. Watson may be as good as Milt, Fart, Knight or Eisley by now. Don't let the "seasoned vet" tag trick you into thinking he's worth putting on the floor.
 
Not to be mr technicality, but that article you posted is 2 years old. Watson may be as good as Milt, Fart, Knight or Eisley by now. Don't let the "seasoned vet" tag trick you into thinking he's worth putting on the floor.

One can't deny that this is worth a shot, at very least. We've been screaming for an upgrade at the backup PG. The FO delivered a pretty good prospect. Whether it works out is yet to be seen, but it's definitely worth the gamble.
 
Back
Top