Hotdog
Well-Known Member
The Knicks are terrible and have been since the Ewing days. Even then they could only get to one NBA finals; and that was their first since 1972. No, the Knicks are content to HEMORRHAGE money to build a team. Same thing they've been doing for decades. Hasn't worked out so well, has it? Plus, big market teams with built in wealth (the NYK is the most valuable NBA franchise) have WAY more flexibility to take risks. And if their fans don't like it, the team DGAF - they'll do what they see fit. There's NO WAY the Jazz could afford to do that on so many levels.
As far as no major FA coming to the Utah Jazz: this is been the case since day 1, 1979 and it hasn't changed. After almost 40 years, one would have to understand that this would be the case in perpetuity unless the Jazz get REALLY lucky. So this should be treated as a given fact and not something to beat up management over.
So, realistically and from a competitive standpoint, the formula the Jazz are using is practical and sensible as opposed to wreckless. And that's our Jazz
words are cool and all. let me know when the Jazz formula works. k?