What's new
By:

Go GET Teague

King Cy said:
I'd rather keep those picks than Burks. We still don't know if OKC can even retain Durant/Westbrook when that pick is due up.
Click to expand...

Which with the protections on that pick will turn it into two second rounders... I would much rather move that than Burks, but your feelings on Burks are well known (you ain't a hater, but you aren't a fan).
 
King Cy said:
So you are still stuck on this and can't take a post for what it is? You have to respond like a child when I question you?

Do you think the FO is 100% truthful with their beat writers when they ask questions? Does Tony Jones have a truth serum he injects into DL before he ask questions?
Click to expand...

In my opinion you do not deserve a serious answer or discussion. You should not be lecturing anyone on anything. Ever.

You are simply incapable, or unwilling, to view my post which you latched on to in any light other than serious.

Kudos you struck out. At least you live up to expectations.
 
In these 24 pages has anyone answered this question that I posted on the 1st??


who was the last player "out indefinitely" that was traded in the NBA ??


In what world does the 4th team in the east trade a starting PG for a SG that's out indefinitely??? seems like fantasy to me.

There's going to be very good PG's in the 2nd round of most of these next few drafts, which means there will be chances to get GOOD pg's with late first round picks. Teague is good and I think he'd lead them to the playoffs, he's not worth some sort of Deron Williams package,
 
PG_AB said:
In these 24 pages has anyone answered this question that I posted on the 1st??


who was the last player "out indefinitely" that was traded in the NBA ??


In what world does the 4th team in the east trade a starting PG for a SG that's out indefinitely??? seems like fantasy to me.

There's going to be very good PG's in the 2nd round of most of these next few drafts, which means there will be chances to get GOOD pg's with late first round picks. Teague is good and I think he'd lead them to the playoffs, he's not worth some sort of Deron Williams package,
Click to expand...

I thought Burks was projected to return at All-Star break?
 
Stoked said:
In my opinion you do not deserve a serious answer or discussion. You should not be lecturing anyone on anything. Ever.

You are simply incapable, or unwilling, to view my post which you latched on to in any light other than serious.

Kudos you struck out. At least you live up to expectations.
Click to expand...

Never seen anyone so hostile before in my life.
 
BTP said:
I'd much rather give Exum as many opportunities as possible next year and see what he's becoming.
Click to expand...
This is reason #1 I don't want a trade
King Cy said:
I thought Burks was projected to return at All-Star break?
Click to expand...

No just speculation that he could return then, but as far as I'm aware it's never been stated as fact. I don't think an official time has been given.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
PG_AB said:
In these 24 pages has anyone answered this question that I posted on the 1st??


who was the last player "out indefinitely" that was traded in the NBA ??


In what world does the 4th team in the east trade a starting PG for a SG that's out indefinitely??? seems like fantasy to me.

There's going to be very good PG's in the 2nd round of most of these next few drafts, which means there will be chances to get GOOD pg's with late first round picks. Teague is good and I think he'd lead them to the playoffs, he's not worth some sort of Deron Williams package,
Click to expand...

I don't think that matters much. It's still about the level of talent of the player in question.

If we had a chance to get Durant, but he was out indefinitely, would we not do it because he's out indefinitely?

How talented the player is matters a lot. The less talented, the more the injury matters. In Burks case it matters some though.
 
16ec09e59328c756df05020db02202d4.jpg


Simmons if nothing else is amusing. First he throws out some ridiculous trades for Hayward, gets blasted for it, and wonders why Utah fans are so high on Hayward.

His true intentions have been revealed. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I say we get rid of Burks. For whatever reason, Hood sucks when Burks is also playing. He was great last season with Burks out, started sucking this season when Burks was back, and then immediately started playing well when Burks got injured again.

I don't think Burks is a cancer like Kanter, and he's a decent player. But he just doesn't add any value to our team and his interaction effect (making Hood suck) actually doesn't bode well for us in the long term.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top