God and Country

[Deleted member 365]

This is fine… definitely won’t cause division among other Christian sects…

This is fine. Definitely a good use of time and resources for a school system that ranks near the bottom for edu funding.


View: https://x.com/ronfilipkowski/status/1806384875986882745?s=46

 

[Deleted member 365]

You don't know what tribalism is, do you.

You’re talking to one of the dumbest posters on this website. He has at least 3 alt accounts that he switches off in order to stir the pot. He’s not just a moron, he’s a ****ing moron. Was probably home schooled

 

[fishonjazz]

This is fine… definitely won’t cause division among other Christian sects…

This is fine. Definitely a good use of time and resources for a school system that ranks near the bottom for edu funding.


View: https://x.com/ronfilipkowski/status/1806384875986882745?s=46

What the actual ****?


Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[Al-O-Meter]

You don't know what tribalism is, do you.

I know what the research say about the health benefits of religious involvement. If some don't want that path for themselves that's fine. We have the freedom to choose, and we are the sum of those choices. Ask Log how his health is.

 

[TheStormofWar]

I know what the research say about the health benefits of religious involvement.

I did not expect any other answer. If you don't know what something is, you probably shouldn't be responding trying disprove it.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

I did not expect any other answer. If you don't know what something is, you probably shouldn't be responding trying disprove it.

I'm responding to the line:

religion in general being bad for society as a whole.

It isn't.

 

[TheStormofWar]

I'm responding to the line:

It isn't.

You are responding to his entire post. You disproved nothing on why he said religion is bad. You ran off on some weird tangent to prove why an imaginary best friend is awesome. Which hey, good for you, but it does not disprove his point.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

You are responding to his entire post. You disproved nothing on why he said religion is bad. You ran off on some weird tangent to prove why an imaginary best friend is awesome. Which hey, good for you, but it does not disprove his point.

Cause has Effect because of Rationale. I don't need to address his Rationale because his claimed Effect, which he clearly pulled from his but whole, is provably wrong. What I provided was proof in the form of about 120 scientific studies from reputable sources that Log was spouting nonsense. The evidence is so overwhelming that I'm not worried you, he, or anyone else can refute it. Lame attempts at nitpicking semantics is all you got. Religion is not bad for society as a whole.

 

[TheStormofWar]

Cause has Effect because of Rationale. I don't need to address his Rationale because his claimed Effect, which he clearly pulled from his but whole, is provably wrong. What I provided was proof in the form of about 120 scientific studies from reputable sources that Log was spouting nonsense. The evidence is so overwhelming that I'm not worried you, he, or anyone else can refute it. Lame attempts at nitpicking semantics is all you got. Religion is not bad for society as a whole.

You're spinning, son. I never said religion was bad. I simply called out you not addressing his point on tribalism.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

I never said religion was bad.

You didn't. Log did. He made the claim that on the whole, meaning when all things are considered, religion is bad for society. The science does not support that claim. In fact, it strongly supports the opposite.

 

[fishonjazz]

We have the freedom to choose.

Uhhhhhh, apparently not in Oklahoma

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[Al-O-Meter]

Uhhhhhh, apparently not in Oklahoma

I chooooose not to live in Oklahoma