Oh shut the **** up everybody. The Jazz are in no way better without Hayward. Just because y'all are bitter doesn't change that he's a damn good player that will make every team he joins significantly better.
Beat me to it.
Oh shut the **** up everybody. The Jazz are in no way better without Hayward. Just because y'all are bitter doesn't change that he's a damn good player that will make every team he joins significantly better.
For 7-years the Jazz tried to manufacture Hayward the star. It was forced and awkward, just like his game.
Allowing the Jazz freedom to move on was a gift, even if he didn't intend to give one.
Jazz were once hamstrung with AK's contract, AK was a better player with a smaller contract.
Rather than envisioning all the possible ways GH or boston could fail, I'd rather say Thank You.
So what is your prediction for Boston wins next year, in order to consider them significantly better? I wouldn't be surprised at all if they were just slightly better. We'll see, but he is coming in as the teacher's pet and there is already some resentment from at least one player with the way their fans were nobslobbing Haywood last year. I saw the interview with Jaylen Brown after they traded away Bradley, and I'd be surprised if it was just Crowder who was already bent out of shape over the situation.
Maybe it will all work out, but I reject the idea he would make ANY team significantly better. Chemistry is not always automatic, even for an ok/slightly good player like Haywood.
I agree with you and in fact think they might be worse. They had to get rid of some dudes in order to get haywood. One of those dudes was avery bradley. Same age as haywood. Same many seasons in the nba as haywood. Not too far off haywoods production either. 16.3 point per game on good shooting percentages (really similar to haywoods %'s). Bradley averaged more rebounds (in less minutes) than haywood. Haywood was a the better passer. I think many people think that bradley is the better defender. Haywood will get around 30 million. Bradley around 8 million.
Plus the celtics lost a few other guys iirc. Plus IT might need hip surgery.
The east as whole did get worse though.
Ya I think that the odds are that they will be a bit better..... but there is a pretty good chance (say 30% imo) that they could be worse. Plus you have to assume that some of their youngsters improve too. Jaylen brown and Marcus smart should improve.I think Bradley is also a good locker room dude. He was the one buoying up IT during his sister's death. G-time and Morris twin make that a less galvanized locker room than last year.
I think their record is likely better as Gordon is just really good and can fit so many different things, but if IT isn't healthy and they have some locker room issues I would not be shocked. It is not HIS locker room and they have some confrontational dudes... Smart, Brown, Morris, Crowder.
Who knows, but I will hate watch them this year for sure.
AK never put it together on a consistent enough basis and his transcendental skills were of little use to us when he was sitting on the bench with back spasms or buckling under the weight of his contract. If you want to argue the player AK SHOULD have been vs the player who Gordon Hayward is, then you've got a healthy argument. If you want to argue the player AK actually ended up being vs Gordon Hayward, I don't think there's a GM in the league that would take AK.
Ya I think that the odds are that they will be a bit better..... but there is a pretty good chance (say 30% imo) that they could be worse. Plus you have to assume that some of their youngsters improve too. Jaylen brown and Marcus smart should improve.
How was their health last year anyway? Do you know?
IT, crowder, horford, bradley etc. Did their key guys miss many games?
Which AK? It's unfair to say "based on who they ended up being." AK is done, Hayward is 27. AK's best couple of seasons were better than Hayward's best couple of seasons. That might change as Hayward isn't done, but AK before we drafted Williams and unnecessarily victimized him was a better player than Hayward so far.
That quote was taken way out of context. He wasn't comparing the fanbases, he was comparing the Celtics history to the Jazz history.