What's new

Grantland: The NBA's All-Intriguing Team (featuring Derrick Favors)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
D

Deleted member 848

Guest
https://www.grantland.com/story/_/i...ony-davis-evan-turner-nba-all-intriguing-team

gl_g_dfavts_576x324.jpg

F/C: Derrick Favors, Utah Jazz

There is still huge optimism around Favors as he enters his fourth season; a slight majority of league executives I polled in the summer said they would take Favors over DeMarcus Cousins long-term. But the idea that Favors might be a true franchise player took a bit of a hit last season, when his developmental curve flattened out.

The questions come mostly on offense, where accumulated flashes of brilliance make Favors appear much more productive than he actually is. He's explosive enough to catch the ball on a pick-and-roll near the foul line and dunk without a dribble — a proto–Tyson Chandler. But Favors shot just 42 percent out of the pick-and-roll last season, a shockingly low number; that mark ranked 90th among 112 players who finished at least 50 pick-and-rolls as the roll man last season, per Synergy, and lots of the guys below him were pick-and-pop shooters.

The cause jumps off the tape: Favors just takes too many tough shots. He gets a little skittish when he catches the ball in space and sees a third help defender waiting for him, in part because he's not yet confident as a passer on the move. Utah ran Favors in a ton of side pick-and-rolls, especially on the right wing, and Favors would often settle for a tricky little jumper from the edge of the paint after catching the ball, turning to face the hoop, and seeing a defender in his way:

iblVw0IvnDymeV.png


Those look like easy shots, but they're not; the league as a whole shoots about as poorly from that in-between range as it does on long 2-pointers. And if he doesn't take that sort of jumper, Favors will sometimes just career into bodies without a plan.

And yet the positive finishes are so, so tantalizing. If he has enough space, he can catch and dunk before the defense can react. And he'll sometimes catch, take one dribble, and loft a feathery lefty layup that could make Matt Harpring just start screaming "JAZZ NATION!" over and over until he dissolves into a puddle.

The same dichotomy is true of Favors's post-up game — lots of very difficult misses sandwiched around a few spins and drop steps and jump hooks that find their way in. Favors will get many more chances this season with Al Jefferson and Paul Millsap gone, and Utah's defense has always been stingier with Favors on the floor. He's quick enough to contain pick-and-rolls in any defensive system, he's already one of the 15 or so best two-way rebounders in the league, and he's a legitimately terrifying help defender who alters shots he doesn't block. The Jazz were ultra-stingy last season when Favors and Enes Kanter shared the floor, but they'll have to prove that can translate against starter-level competition — and that Utah can score when they play together.

The lack of anything even resembling an average passing point guard will hurt, just as it did last season. Any big man looks better alongside a pick-and-roll partner who can get deep into a defense and time interior passes just right.


-Zach Lowe

burkeface.gif
 
That is a little bit surprising that a majority of GM's would rather have Favors than Cousins. I know that Cousins is a head case, but still surprising, given Cousins size and production.

They probably prefer someone who helps the team win.
 
That is a little bit surprising that a majority of GM's would rather have Favors than Cousins. I know that Cousins is a head case, but still surprising, given Cousins size and production.

Cousins is not as efficient, and not as good of a defender. Give Favors the extra 7 minutes Cousins gets and he's better in all but the pts scored category and that will still be fairly close.
 
But Cousins helped his team to like 29 wins right? And some of those games they were playing 4 on 5, cuz they has teh Jimmer...

Nice try on the Jimmer hate, but he didn't play much last year, and you'll notice Cousin's number dipped.
 
Nice try on the Jimmer hate, but he didn't play much last year, and you'll notice Cousin's number dipped.

You are a spazz. So Cousins played worse when Jimmer was on the court? Kinda proves my point, don't it? Also, it was a joke in the first place.
 
You are a spazz. So Cousins played worse when Jimmer was on the court? Kinda proves my point, don't it? Also, it was a joke in the first place.

First of all thanks.

Secondly, mine was a joke as well.

Thirdly, you have reading comprehension issues. I said Cousins numbers dipped last year because Jimmer played less minutes. Does not prove your point.
 
A majority of GM's would take Favors over Cousins. In other words, someone is gonna offer him the max, if we let him enter free agency.
 
That is a little bit surprising that a majority of GM's would rather have Favors than Cousins. I know that Cousins is a head case, but still surprising, given Cousins size and production.

What's sad is that given how much Cousins hurts his team, that Favors has developed so little that it is even a debate.
 
Favors needs to be our 5, Kanter our stretch 4.

Yeah, the Jazz should definitely park their best interior player on the three-point line so that the guy that has no clue what he's doing inside can have space to abuse his matchup.
 
Yeah, the Jazz should definitely park their best interior player on the three-point line so that the guy that has no clue what he's doing inside can have space to abuse his matchup.


I didn't say to park him there. Why do people on this forum always make up the other person's argument so they can pretend beat it?

Kaner can play inside and outside, so why keep him only inside?

BTW, I responded to you in the other thread.
 
I didn't say to park him there. Why do people on this forum always make up the other person's argument so they can pretend beat it?

Kaner can play inside and outside, so why keep him only inside?

BTW, I responded to you in the other thread.
I get what you are saying and I don't have a problem Kanter playing 4 on the offense.

I think your "stretch 4" phrase irked people. Because when you say that, completely different players from Kanter come to mind.
 
Last edited:
Favors needs to be our 5, Kanter our stretch 4.

Still undecided about that. Most stretch 4s have no inside game and can't rebound worth a lick, so there is good reason for them to step out. Kevin Love might be the only exception to that rule. Imo, Kanter would need to be near a 40% three point shooter to make it worth his while.
 
Back
Top