NAOS
Well-Known Member
Haywardinvitedinmyazz.com
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk
makes sense.
Haywardinvitedinmyazz.com
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk
yepThis is a bad look ...
...for one of the better posters on the board.
You literally discredit George's shooting this season to a "small sample size" and then bring up Hayward's numbers in 2 games?!?
An opposing player has a better game than Hayward? Oh, Hayward sucks he will never be that good, end of discussion.
The distance that you moved the target is impressive.
Lawd have mercy.
People saying Hayward is better than George. The homer is strong in here.
An opposing player has a better game than Hayward? Oh, Hayward sucks he will never be that good, end of discussion.
I find it hilarious people won't recognize what an inherent offensive advantage George has over Hayward in his team's composition.
Also hilarious how quickly people try to discredit Hayward at every ****ing turn.
Burks has a good game? He should be our lead scorer, Hayward sucks.
Favors has a great game? He is the face of the franchise, Hayward is #2.
An opposing player has a better game than Hayward? Oh, Hayward sucks he will never be that good, end of discussion.
Meanwhile Hayward is on a 5 game streak where he is averaging 24-5-3.5 and you would think he is chopped liver according to some posters on this site who are looking to denounce him at every turn. Same thing with Burke.
As one of Hayward's biggest supporters, I understand what you are saying regarding many of the posters on this board underrating him. I agree that Hayward has a few attributes that rival PG's, but without a doubt, PG is a superior player at this point in his career and probably for his entire career. That doesn't mean Hayward isn't really good.
I find it hilarious people won't recognize what an inherent offensive advantage George has over Hayward in his team's composition.
Also hilarious how quickly people try to discredit Hayward at every ****ing turn.
Burks has a good game? He should be our lead scorer, Hayward sucks.
Favors has a great game? He is the face of the franchise, Hayward is #2.
An opposing player has a better game than Hayward? Oh, Hayward sucks he will never be that good, end of discussion.
Meanwhile Hayward is on a 5 game streak where he is averaging 24-5-3.5 and you would think he is chopped liver according to some posters on this site who are looking to denounce him at every turn. Same thing with Burke.
I think George is having a better year. I think who is the better player is close enough that crowing either of them beyond a shadow of a doubt is foolish, especially when Hayward just showed he handled George in crunch time.