Republicans’ collapse in the Texas suburbs — which is a major factor in making the state competitive — will only accelerate with its defiant attitude on any gun-safety measure. (Of suburban voters in the recent Quinnipiac national poll, I recently noted, “Among those voters, 96 percent favor background checks, 62 percent favor an assault weapons ban, 82 percent favor red flag laws, and 85 percent support gun licensing.”) Republicans’ intransigence in the face of the state’s second mass shooting in less than a month will only make matters worse for a party struggling to avoid alienating a key component of winning Republican coalitions in the past.
I don’t think it’s a good idea to politicize gun control. A tyrannical government can emerge from both sides.
It’s been politicized for years. Those who advocate sensible gun control to make our society safer are called weak, anti-constitutional, and face NRA funded opposition.
Would sensible (more like sensitive) gun control make us safer from say, a Trump administration gone full dictatorship? Both you and I know he would drool at the idea of becoming a dictator the likes of Kim Jung.
Would sensible (more like sensitive) gun control make us safer from say, a Trump administration gone full dictatorship? Both you and I know he would drool at the idea of becoming a dictator the likes of Kim Jung.
I don't buy that. You can have a gun in every house and it won't stop the tyranny raising to the power if the society is not conscious or educated well enough to see it coming. One courageous and independently thinking person can be more dangerous for a tyran than a troop of arms.
A. I don't see it (kim Jung style dictators taking over) happening in other developed countries.Would sensible (more like sensitive) gun control make us safer from say, a Trump administration gone full dictatorship? Both you and I know he would drool at the idea of becoming a dictator the likes of Kim Jung.
If you want to get specific when it was written hand-guns really didn't exist in anything near the same form as today. They had muskets, flint-lock and variants largely. So if that is what determines it then we can all have some flint-lock muskets.Does it say in the Constitution what kind of arms you have the right to bear? If it don't specify then, well, you still have the right to bear arms just not the arms you want to bear.
Hell, maybe they were talking about sleeveless shirts? Who knows, that document was written long long ago.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
If you want to get specific when it was written hand-guns really didn't exist in anything near the same form as today. They had muskets, flint-lock and variants largely. So if that is what determines it then we can all have some flint-lock muskets.
Here is a muzzle-loading pistol from that era.
![]()
https://www.icollector.com/Constric...Pistol-with-Continental-Army-Depart_i11027901
And here's a nice musket to replace that AR-15.
(Can't connect to the actual picture so it looks something like this)
![]()
https://www.ima-usa.com/collections...-captured-at-the-siege-of-seringpatam-in-1799
Um. Sure. But no bump-stocks.Can I modify one of these into a flamethrower?