What's new
By:

Gun Control

Stoked said:
I do not see how Moe was really saying that so unless there is a big discussion between you to I am missing I think this was a little pre emptive.
Click to expand...

yah, you're probably right. I couldn't see where moe's comments related to anything, either.
 
Stoked said:
Since you don't, as Colton showed, it is a valid observation.
Click to expand...

I acknowledged what I was saying was painful. I did not diminish or deny the pain felt. I never attached personal responsibility solely to colton for what he felt, but acknowledged that I was responsible for the pain I caused. I tried to open a dialogue on less painful ways of communicating.

I have not asked for anything different than that from you or any other person in these discussions.

I am many things, but in this case, hypocrite is not among them.
 
babe said:
you want restrictions on gun sellers and buyers and anyone already with a gun, because you believe somehow this will improve things in your neighborhood. Lots of people around who think that. So get yourselves a neighborhood of like-minded folks and put up a fence and some signs: "Gun Free Zone". Leave your doors unlocked and your windows open, and sleep the sleep of the Just.
Click to expand...

I live in the state with the nation's strictest gun laws. I regularly sleep with windows open and doors unlocked. I sleep pretty darn well.
 
Hartsock said:
In St Louis? You must be crazy.
Click to expand...

Actually, I live in O'Fallon, IL, right now. Nothing much happens in the boondocks, except police hassling black drivers.

However, it was just as true when I lived at 3003 LaClede, some 35-40 years ago. We did have air conditioning, so the windows were open.
 
One Brow said:
Actually, I live in O'Fallon, IL, right now. Nothing much happens in the boondocks, except police hassling black drivers.

However, it was just as true when I lived at 3003 LaClede, some 35-40 years ago. We did have air conditioning, so the windows were open.
Click to expand...

Safety first





























Kidding, calm down!!
 
franklin said:
I know plenty near anarchists who would strongly disagree with limiting private transactions in any way that leaves a paper trail, but the polls show they're in the minority. They certainly haven't reared a single head in this thread.
Click to expand...

I'm no anarchist, but do want to point something out that I believe is valid.

Paper transactions just make it easier for some sort of conquering power or 2nd-amendment-infringing government entity to find and retrieve the guns owned by the general population, or at the very least arrest/eliminate those that own guns. That is worrisome.
 
leftyjace said:
I'm no anarchist, but do want to point something out that I believe is valid.

Paper transactions just make it easier for some sort of conquering power or 2nd-amendment-infringing government entity to find and retrieve the guns owned by the general population, or at the very least arrest/eliminate those that own guns. That is worrisome.
Click to expand...

You mean all these protect the nation gun owners are going to wait until after getting conquered to use their guns to protect the nation? Pretty ****ty strategy IMO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top