What's new
By:

Haven't these stupid asses caused enough problems?

Maybe I'm a foodie, but I don't order seafood unless I'm in a seafood restaurant and I don't order steak unless I'm in a steak house.
 
babe said:
Not true. I just had a good tilapia at iHOP in Reno.

Back on the road to SF tonight. . .

Already profitable for the whole crazy loop. . .
Click to expand...

Should have told me I would have met you for dinner
 
E.J. Wells said:
https://www.sltrib.com/news/1788985-155/peterson-restaurant-facebook-broadhead-police-post


First, their idiot son takes a samurai sword to a job interview to "impress" them, swings it at a cop, runs away, and gets shot for being a dumb ***. Rather than take accountability for being a horrible parent, the mother of this kid blames it all on race, throws more fuel on the fire of recent tensions, and effectively costs tax payers money and likely some people their jobs, livelihood, family safety, etc.

That wasn't enough for this family of morons; the apple doesn't fall far from the tree it seems.

Some idiot, let's just call him HighlandHomley, posted a picture of a cop lying dead in the road with a bullet in his forehead on his personal Facebook page. Someone, who is in dire need of minding their own business, discovered the diner where HighlandHomely worked and posted a screen shot of his post on the resturaunt's FB page. Unlike certain morons with the initials of HH, this kid took responsibility for his stupidity, and although the diner supported him, he asked to be fired amid the scandle and negativity that was being drawn to the FB page and diner.

So they canned him, made a very reasonable post explaining the situation, and it should have ended there, right?





Those pesky facts keep getting in the way of stupidity.



Nice work, morons. Now someone else is losing their livelihood because you're an uninformed buffoon. Please take note, HighlandHomley's of the world, stay celibate.
Click to expand...

As I read this story, the 'uninformed buffoon' had nothing to do with anyone losing their livelihood. The cause of someone losing their livelihood were the, in your words, persons "who [are] in dire need of minding their own business," which, according to the article, appear to be police officers, (and their supporters) who chose to make an issue of this and initiate protests against the dinner leading to Peterson asking to be fired. The 'uninformed buffoon' entered the picture after the fact and had nothing to do with anyone losing his or her livelihood.

It seems to be that your rant is targeted at the entirely wrong person(s). It should be targeted at the police officers and their supporters who chose to punish an entirely innocent business establishment for the misguided Facebook post of one of its employees. (I assume that the dinner does not make monitoring its employees private lives and social media participation criteria of employment.)
 
jimmy eat jazz said:
As I read this story, the 'uninformed buffoon' had nothing to do with anyone losing their livelihood. The cause of someone losing their livelihood were the, in your words, persons "who [are] in dire need of minding their own business," which, according to the article, appear to be police officers, (and their supporters) who chose to make an issue of this and initiate protests against the dinner leading to Peterson asking to be fired. The 'uninformed buffoon' entered the picture after the fact and had nothing to do with anyone losing his or her livelihood.

It seems to be that your rant is targeted at the entirely wrong person(s). It should be targeted at the police officers and their supporters who chose to punish an entirely innocent business establishment for the misguided Facebook post of one of its employees. (I assume that the dinner does not make monitoring its employees private lives and social media participation criteria of employment.)
Click to expand...
You do realize you're spelling "diner" wrong?
 
jimmy eat jazz said:
As I read this story, the 'uninformed buffoon' had nothing to do with anyone losing their livelihood. The cause of someone losing their livelihood were the, in your words, persons "who [are] in dire need of minding their own business," which, according to the article, appear to be police officers, (and their supporters) who chose to make an issue of this and initiate protests against the dinner leading to Peterson asking to be fired. The 'uninformed buffoon' entered the picture after the fact and had nothing to do with anyone losing his or her livelihood.

It seems to be that your rant is targeted at the entirely wrong person(s). It should be targeted at the police officers and their supporters who chose to punish an entirely innocent business establishment for the misguided Facebook post of one of its employees. (I assume that the dinner does not make monitoring its employees private lives and social media participation criteria of employment.)
Click to expand...

Next time, try reading what I post.

Thanks.
 
bigb said:
You do realize you're spelling "diner" wrong?
Click to expand...

A more appropriate question is to ask me whether I give a f*** that I'm spelling "diner" wrong.

You can probably guess the answer.

By the way, wrong is an adjective, not an adverb. For that sentence, you need an adverb, not an adjective. The correct phrasing would be, "You do realize you're spelling "diner" incorrectly."

See how easy it is to make mistakes and at the same time be a dick pointing them out to others?
 
E.J. Wells said:
Next time, try reading what I post.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

I went back and re-read your post.

Please tell me what I got wrong, seriously, as re-reading your post didn't clear things up like you assumed it should.

Perhaps your powers of communication are not as stellar as you imagine them to be, and your post reasonably leads to different conclusions/interpretations.

Won't be the first time in the history of human kind that happened.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top