Fishsticks
Banned
Not if they let him walk.
Still flicks the jazz as we could have used a reasonably priced Hayward.
Not if they let him walk.
Explain yourself sir. Sorry to say I can read the future and whatever you blurb is about to make no sense.
Playing devil's advocate here... If the Jazz let Hayward walk, who do they sign to replace him? They will not get any free agents to go to Utah that are anywhere near the player that Hayward is, so do the Jazz just hope that Hood or an undrafted summer league guy will be enough, and then hope for a good wing in next year's lottery? Again, I am on the fence about Hayward's value, but what do you do as an organization if you let him walk?
Cowhide made a joke (i think) and vermin is mad at the offer, not at hayward.
Plus vermin is always mad
Why? It's not like he took a smaller contract for the team. He just didn't feel like risking as much as Gordon did.
Jazz said they will match. Making bad decisions on contracts affects the team. What if it interferes with resigning Kanter and Burks? Or some other free agent next year?
What the Jazz pay their players does matter. If you can't see that then that's your loss.
You know this how?
2014/15 salary
Steph Curry: 10 million
Nic Batum: 11.7 million
Demar Derozan: 9.5 million
Paul Millsap: 9.5 million
Goran Dragic: 7.5 million
Jamal Crawford 5.4 million
Gordon Hayward: 15 million??![]()
IF the Jazz re-sign Hayward, I can guarantee we trade Kanter or Burks this year.
Jazz said they will match. Making bad decisions on contracts affects the team. What if it interferes with resigning Kanter and Burks? Or some other free agent next year?
What the Jazz pay their players does matter. If you can't see that then that's your loss.