What's new

Hayward - not most coachable ?

I don't see why the fact that Hayward is clearly a hard worker would mean that he is necessarily coachable. One thing doesn't necessarily have anything to do with another. Hayward, for instance, may have a great work ethic but be stubborn and unwilling to take orders/advice. He would, thus, be "not the most coachable" player despite being a really hard-working one.
 
Last edited:
I don't see why the fact that Hayward is clearly a hard worker would mean that he is necessarily coachable. One thing doesn't necessarily have anything to do with another. Hayward, for instance, may have a great work ethic but be stubborn and unwilling to take orders/advice. He would, thus, be "not the most coachable" player despite being a really hard-working one.
I listened to the podcast and stubbornness is what seemed like Locke was implying.
 
Anyone listen to the lock podcast this week where he went in great detail on Haywards work
ethic this summer starting at 7am daily with the Jazz trainers...

The podcast was 100% glowing review on Haywards work ethic and commitment.

The only line I found strange and it was mentioned matter of fact and not discussed

and I am paraphrasing "and it got tough because Hayward is not the most coachable athlete"

that surprised me.....

I swear there is an entire thread about how you weren't going to listen to Locke anymore...
 
It's great Hayward took matters into his own hands. Trainers and player development guys don't have much of a track record with the others: Exum and Lyles still can't shoot, Favors starts off the year with an overuse injury, and no one else has really grown that much, with the exception of Ingles' 3pt shooting.
 
Back
Top