What's new
By:

Hayward or Kanter

Who will be gone next season?

  • Hayward

    Votes: 16 28.1%

  • Kanter

    Votes: 9 15.8%

  • Both

    Votes: 3 5.3%

  • Neither

    Votes: 29 50.9%
  • Total voters
    57
^^ what an ******* ^^

~ hey I wrote this one for myself but you replied earlier.


lol I never thought of you to take it seriously even though I was serious.


Babe you just need to quit ****ting all over obviously good posts just because you cannot top it. It ain't you. It's OK that you want Kanter gone. Me too. If Ty is still here. I want the better for the kid. But we all should respect the hardwork here instead of going ridiculous troll diarrhea on'em.
 
Vermin said:
Oh did I ruffle you there fella? When Kanter is gone this board will gain at least 100 points on the IQ meter. Respectable to you= Kanter jock rider.
Click to expand...



Oh **** no!


I respect the most extreme opposite in here if he's intimate about his idea(l)s. This most defi-****ing-nitely is not me braw. It ain't me.
 
addictionary said:
^^ what an ******* ^^

~ hey I wrote this one for myself but you replied earlier.


lol I never thought of you to take it seriously even though I was serious.


Babe you just need to quit ****ting all over obviously good posts just because you cannot top it. It ain't you. It's OK that you want Kanter gone. Me too. If Ty is still here. I want the better for the kid. But we all should respect the hardwork here instead of going ridiculous troll diarrhea on'em.
Click to expand...

Top what? A misguided interpretation of an interview? Raise of hands...who else believes that the quotes SF posted indicate the Jazz want to trade Favors because our future front court is Kanter and Gobert? Bueller.....Bueller.....Bueller....Bueller.
 
Vermin said:
Top what? A misguided interpretation of an interview? Raise of hands...who else believes that the quotes SF posted indicate the Jazz want to trade Favors because our future front court is Kanter and Gobert? Bueller.....Bueller.....Bueller....Bueller.
Click to expand...


Yeah, calling Gobert the future went a little bit too far in there alright.

I also think Favors is a keeper. Both for me and for the FO apparantly. But new dude on the top, a possible new coach, a fresh new star franchise player candidate. Only God knows what will happen to the Jazz.
 
Vermin said:
Top what? A misguided interpretation of an interview? Raise of hands...who else believes that the quotes SF posted indicate the Jazz want to trade Favors because our future front court is Kanter and Gobert? Bueller.....Bueller.....Bueller....Bueller.
Click to expand...

Reading comprehension. That is not what I said.


Seriously, you always struggle with any post that isn't spelled out for you.
 
Sexual Favors said:
Hayward will stay because we can't trade him for his value. A sign and trade wouldn't net his full value, and no team would have incentive to do so. Conversely, we have the money to max Hayward for the next 4 years if we wanted to and not have it affect the ability to sign whoever we draft this year. Other teams know this, and will probably see a bidding war as futile. Why would they want to tie up their cap space when they could be recruiting more attainable free agents? Signing Hayward still leaves us with cap space. Letting players walk for cap space, like in the cases of Al and Paul, was a one time thing, and not a message the FO is wanting to send to the league. Forming a habit of letting all of our best players walk at contract time would make us obsolete and non factors in trade talks. Why would any team ever trade with us again if they believed they could just get our players in free agency!?
Click to expand...

I agree. Even IF Hayward gets an offer for big money, it makes sense to match. Why? Because the Jazz have ZERO money concerns for the next four years. They can still pay Burks and Kanter, have Hayward and Favors for major money AND bring in a FA or two without exceeding the luxury tax threshold. To simply let Hayward "walk" makes no sense unless they acquired a free agent of equal value. I get that people are down on Hayward; he's coming off the worst season of his career. But he still averaged 16/5/5 and got to the line regularly. Just improve his shooting percentages to his career averages (easily doable) and all of a sudden he's close to a 20/5/5 player.

In addition, this young team, that should have been running up and down the court, was playing half-court offense most of the time. It's no wonder Hayward sounded frustrated. And that is CLEARLY on Ty. New coach, better offensive system, reign in Gordon a bit on his ball-handling and driving to the hoop. Then you have a player that is a huge trade asset if that time comes. There is simply no reason to just let him walk. Match whatever 4-yr deal he gets; that contract is up before the Jazz are faced with major $ constraints and have to start choosing between players.
 
Sexual Favors said:
Reading comprehension. That is not what I said.


Seriously, you always struggle with any post that isn't spelled out for you.
Click to expand...

You said:
Kanter stays because he is trending upward in a big way, but still doesn't have a trade value that reflects actual value/potential. The best two man lineup for the past month has ironically been Kanter and Favors. Since March 1st, Kanter has averaged something like 14 pts and 10.5 REBs in less than 30 mins. I am pretty sure Jazz are still high on him. Dennis Lindsey basically said he sees Kanter and Gobert as the front court of the future in his interviews earlier this year on 1280.
Click to expand...

Thats right, you said "basically". My bad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top