I almost always fall back on this, which is pretty sad, I agree. However, if you go back and read my first posts in this thread, I think I was fairly rational. You made a statement with your opinion, I responded with mine. Several others also responded like me. There has yet to be any proof, anecdotal or otherwise, that your opinion was based in any form of fact. You kept on keeping on, however, and instead of saying, "You know what, I might be off on my assessment" or even "Hmmm, good points, but I still hate her" (which would allow you to keep being ignorant, but at least you'd yield on the falsehood of her stealing from earthquake victims) but you chose to keep on posting crap. Once crap has been flung, I happily dive right in. It's cherry picking, I know, but I be who I be.