The wheel made it launch. All the dust moved in a parabolic fashion. Dust that came off the wheel higher had a different trajectory than dust that came off lower. No anomaly, just obvious science.
Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!
- Thread starter TroutBum
- Start date
- Status
So, anyway, there is one thing about the craft shown as the postulate "Moon Lander"/
In the fun movie "Fly Away Home" the guy who plays dad/inventor says they left it there.
This kind of statement leaves actually thinking humans with a question.....
And oh, there's another thing.
To get out of Moon gravity, you need to lift the weight of the return craft and the astronauts up to the orbiter. As a chemist, I've never seen a pic where there could have been enough fuel of any kind we have any record of using, that could have done that.
So we sacrificed some prisoners from Folsom, right. Two guys on death row, and used an alternate method of execution.
In the fun movie "Fly Away Home" the guy who plays dad/inventor says they left it there.
This kind of statement leaves actually thinking humans with a question.....
And oh, there's another thing.
To get out of Moon gravity, you need to lift the weight of the return craft and the astronauts up to the orbiter. As a chemist, I've never seen a pic where there could have been enough fuel of any kind we have any record of using, that could have done that.
So we sacrificed some prisoners from Folsom, right. Two guys on death row, and used an alternate method of execution.
Well, most people have alternate ideas they will go to when one thing turns out to be wrong.
Maybe you could thank someone who gave you a reason to embrace world view 2.0.l
Dances With Clowns
Member
Have you people looked at the anomaly I pointed out in this video?
Holy piss, the Apollo moon missions were fake?!
I wonder what would be behind a name tag like "Cosmo Red". I used to know a woman with bright red hair. Her email address was cosmored...something. I stole the name from her.jazzfanz.com
Tell us what makes the dust blow when the lid falls. Start watching at the 2:07:26 time mark.
How about you tell US why a falling lid only affects a tiny corner and to the side. This sort of stuff is dead obvious, the astronaut pushes that battery cover down - if it's on Earth - and it sends a great big draft of air, only there is no draft of air, just a disturbance from the collision. My guess would be that the bottom underside hit first.
There is no chance at all that a falling lid doesn't send dust everywhere if this thing is faked on Earth. You gonna address that?
If you look closely, you'll see that the bottom part of the lid doesn't make contact with the surface; there's no collision so that can't be the explanation. It looks like air to me.
Dances With Clowns
Member
So instead of explaining the totally obvious absence of draft from the falling battery lid, you choose to ignore this and make the ridiculous statement about nothing actually making contact to stop the lid falling?
SOMETHING stopped it from falling. This is the bit that it hits first when it reaches the bottom. Again, blindingly obvious, so your statement is absurd. Now try again and explain to all the "viewers" eagerly awaiting your explanation. The lid falls and creates no draft in the direction of fall, now THAT is impossible unless it is in a vacuum.
You see, this piece of footage is doing the opposite of what you hoped. It proves the sequence must actually be in a vacuum - nobody who watches this can fail to see the obvious.
I found it was hard to convince Americans that we were the bad guys in the world because they were used to hearing that we defended freedom and democracy when we were in wars abroad.
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145531
I figured that their seeing the proof that the moon missions were faked would wake them up and they'd be more objective about the evidence that we were the bad guys.
The underside is obviously hitting something which stops it from falling. The bottom of the lid is obviously not it because it doesn't fall far enough to make contact. The movement of the dust is consistent with air pushing it.
Everyone with power is the bad guy, because to keep power you have to use it against the less powerful. This has nothing to do with the moon landings.
That's a pretty simplistic reply. What do you think of this info?
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=145531
Dances With Clowns
Member
And yet again you are simply afraid to address the MAJOR issue in favour of your ridiculous and pointless denial of something that MUST be obvious. How can it NOT be the bottom of the lid!? It can't be the top, or maybe it is the side where the small puff occurs. Who knows. You just ignore the complete absence of the draft that MUST occur in air.
Now next post, stop tip-toeing around it and address it. You are check mated. The lack of a draft proves it is in a vacuum. You cannot fail to know this.
Dances With Clowns
Member
I wonder what the Utah Jazz forum owner thinks about you linking to another basketball forum? Is this a world wide spam mission?
- Status