What's new

Houston..

ITs ironic that those who voted against sending aid in response to Sandy are the first ones to the federal government trough. Ted Cruz is such an *** wipe.

Guess things change when it's your own state that's been wiped out.

It'd be hilarious if those "east coast elitists" held up funding to rebuild Texas. Every now and again people need a reminder of the GOP's the federal government does. I'm guessing millions of houstonians rich now are thrilled to hear the 9 most "terrifying words: "I'm from the government and I'm here to help!"

We aren't islands folks! We all need each other.

Mike Pence and later ted Cruz and mike led politcizing disasters was utterly deplorable

Cause it was 90% pork! You liberals can not resist using any an everthink to load up bills with pork.

Do not politicize it an load it with pork! Plane an simple.

Every republican would have voted in favour of aid it would have been 100% unanimous.

But no you have to load it up with billions in pork!
 
Central China Flood in 1913 flooded more area then England an they are claiming global warming is excellerating the outcome? I do not see 3.7 million dead people!
 
Straw man logic

Do ya know where the term originated from?

Back in the day of kings huntin parties used horses as the four hooves don't scare away big game like unnatural seemin humins do. The deer an elk an moose don't git scared off ya kin walts right inta them.

So the people started callin them horses straw men cause they was doin the opposite of what a straw man does. Ain't no threat under camouflage tactic.
 
Do ya know where the term originated from?

Back in the day of kings huntin parties used horses as the four hooves don't scare away big game like unnatural seemin humins do. The deer an elk an moose don't git scared off ya kin walts right inta them.

So the people started callin them horses straw men cause they was doin the opposite of what a straw man does. Ain't no threat under camouflage tactic.

The term, in regard to the logical fallacy is based on the idea that you build up a straw-man that represents your opponents argument, but in the way you see your opponents argument, not the actual argument your opponent is making, and then you tear the straw-man down and claim victory, as if, in your own mind, you actually just vested your real-life foe, when in reality all you did was beat up a dummy of your own creation.
 
The term, in regard to the logical fallacy is based on the idea that you build up a straw-man that represents your opponents argument, but in the way you see your opponents argument, not the actual argument your opponent is making, and then you tear the straw-man down and claim victory, as if, in your own mind, you actually just vested your real-life foe, when in reality all you did was beat up a dummy of your own creation.

You do not prefer historical tangents?
 
I also hope that all Humane Society members stopped helping animals to go to Texas. Also, those who support MS research should put that on hold and go help Texas. Really, if you want to ever claim you care about anything ever again you need to stop caring about what you're really passionate about and go help Texas...

Or maybe that's complete **** logic?

ahh Antifa is equivalent to a humanitarian or animal loving group ??? ok
 
Cause it was 90% pork! You liberals can not resist using any an everthink to load up bills with pork.

Do not politicize it an load it with pork! Plane an simple.

Every republican would have voted in favour of aid it would have been 100% unanimous.

But no you have to load it up with billions in pork!

Nope. You're wrong again....

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...uzs-mostly-false-claim-two-thirds-sandy-reli/

And don't give me the "Politifact,'nuff said" nonsense. Read the facts. This info can be independently verified...
 
the more i read and see about this, the more it seems like it could have been prevented, with simple flood management systems. 1 of the true jobs of government!

we can either blame it on this "mythical man made climate change" or you can start building for the next storm. whoch can be in 5 years in another place.

that is enough time to prepare and build infrastructure, but big government cannot have that.

the flooding should never happen at such a large scale.


How to sound smart talking about climate change and hurricanes:


https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/...t-talking-about-climate-change-and-hurricanes

"But it seems that some of the same people who have been denying climate change for years are also not interested in mitigating the damage. Donald Trump's executive order earlier this month, rolling back Obama-era provisions aimed at avoiding infrastructure damage from future climate-related calamities, was downright perverse. If the order is implemented successfully, Americans in future decades will be the ones who suffer materially from Harveys and Katrinas still to come. And there will definitely be more storms like this."
 
Back
Top