Twin Towers
Well-Known Member
Yeah I hear what you're saying.
But I think you've got to then give the coaching staff some credit and let them do their job.
Irving is an above average shooter at PG and Hayward is an above average passer at SG IMO.
Don't you think they'll run plays that involve Hayward a lot more as the ball handler but still utilising Irving's shooting ability?
BPA is what we keep hearing and I think if we get Irving at #2, you'd have to take him.
But I can't give the coaching credit for something they have NEVER done. Nothing in the Jazz history shows we will put the ball in the wing players hands more. The only time we did was the year we had AK and Arroyo. Which was by default.
I know the players have the ability to make it happen. I have total faith that Irving would accept that role but I don't have faith in the coaching staff. There was rumors about Corbin putting the ball in Hayward's hands more next year but its tough to say it if will. Odds are it won't.
I honestly don't think Irving is more valuable to a team than Kanter is. Kanter provides more for a playoff team than Irving does in my opinion. Both players would come off the bench if they were drafted today anyways.
But also I only want the PG to be able to score 10-12 points per game average 5 or 6 assists and shoot a high percentage. Set the offense up to run the play but not be the only playmaker on the team. Finding guys who can average those stats and play decent defense are easy to find compared to quality big men or quality wing players.