What's new

How did Exum look last night?

giphy.gif
 
With an offensive rating of 127 and a PER of 23.9. Both of which are the best on our team. Although just barely, Gobert is at 124 offensive rating and 20.9 PER.

Exum's PER would be 9th in the NBA if he qualified. Exum's Offensive rating would be #2 in the league.

Those are according to basketball reference. NBA.com are different. Here are the Jazz advanced stats on NBA.com. Exum is leading in just about everything (besides the 1/2 minute of play from Naz)
http://stats.nba.com/players/advanced/?sort=OFF_RATING&dir=-1&Season=2017-18&SeasonType=Regular Season&TeamID=1610612762

NBA.com advanced defensive stats show great things as well.


Those numbers are probably not sustainable but I think it shows how good he has looked in his limited numbers so far.

Since you're using OR and PER as two stats to show the value of a player, it should be noted that Ben Simmons' Offensive Rating of 109.1 is better than Donovan Mitchell's of 106.6. His PER of 19.79 is also better than Mitchell's 16.49.
 
With an offensive rating of 127 and a PER of 23.9. Both of which are the best on our team. Although just barely, Gobert is at 124 offensive rating and 20.9 PER.

Exum's PER would be 9th in the NBA if he qualified. Exum's Offensive rating would be #2 in the league.

I love it when we point to historically worst PER ever after Exum's first season some people quickly dismiss it as "PER is useless stat". Yet here we see PER used after few games to tell that Exum is great? There is no question kid looks much better - but the sample is very limited. How about we let him have at least 30-40 games and then talk how good or bad he is.
 
Since you're using OR and PER as two stats to show the value of a player, it should be noted that Ben Simmons' Offensive Rating of 109.1 is better than Donovan Mitchell's of 106.6. His PER of 19.79 is also better than Mitchell's 16.49.

Yes, he certainly is better at some stats.
 
I love it when we point to historically worst PER ever after Exum's first season some people quickly dismiss it as "PER is useless stat". Yet here we see PER used after few games to tell that Exum is great? There is no question kid looks much better - but the sample is very limited. How about we let him have at least 30-40 games and then talk how good or bad he is.

I find stats to be very useful. They are just not the entire story always and circumstances are always different.

In this case I am using that stat for people like you. Who say he was the worst in the nba based on that stat, so obviously now he must be the best on the Jazz by your standard. At least in these games so far.
 
I find stats to be very useful. They are just not the entire story always and circumstances are always different.

In this case I am using that stat for people like you. Who say he was the worst in the nba based on that stat, so obviously now he must be the best on the Jazz by your standard. At least in these games so far.

Rofl. Way to change your narrative.
 
Rofl. Way to change your narrative.

Never has that changed. Please note where I have said one stat is the most meaningful.

Just like in this case, you showed some stats that are positive for Exum and I showed some more stats that were positive for him. I even said I didnt think they were sustainable but showed he is playing pretty well. But I also have thought he has played well before but just inconsistent for a variety of reasons.

Do you think he is not playing well?

Is your best argument for everything ROFL? It is one of your better points.
 
Back
Top