How many infractions do you have?

[Dr. Jones]

Yeah! Warning for posting an insider piece with the jazz offseason grades. This was not even 1/35th of the piece. Thank the whiney *** members on this board and the bi polar mods, no more insider pieces at least from me. biznitches.

Can't help but laugh a little .. think Wes reported?

 

[Stifle Tower]

Yeah! Warning for posting an insider piece with the jazz offseason grades. This was not even 1/35th of the piece. Thank the whiney *** members on this board and the bi polar mods, no more insider pieces at least from me. biznitches.

That's %^$#@.

I can understand a PM, explaining the policy and why your snippet of the original article was unacceptable. And then suggesting the length of quote that would be ok. But to just give you a warning? That's %^&$#!

When can we vote these mods out and replace with new ones?

 

[Fishsticks]

Can't help but laugh a little .. think Wes reported?

Absolutely he did.

 

[nightmare3983]

Why is everything so worked up over a warning? Better that than an infraction.

 

[Stifle Tower]

Absolutely he did.

If Jazzfanz is in mortal danger of having a lawsuit brought against them because of your post, I'm just wondering why it hasn't been removed.
And I would think posting "Uh...mods?" is clearly calling you out in public (vs sending a report to the mods). Wouldn't that qualify as "backseast moderating" under the posted rules?

"Back-seat Moderators: If members note a possible problem, they are welcome to bring it to the attention of a moderator or administrator via a private message. However, members are asked to not act as "back-seat moderators"; please do not make moderation-related comments in board threads. Members who consistently "act" as moderators may receive infractions."

 

[Dr. Jones]

If Jazzfanz is in mortal danger of having a lawsuit brought against them because of your post, I'm just wondering why it hasn't been removed.
And I would think posting "Uh...mods?" is clearly calling you out in public (vs sending a report to the mods). Wouldn't that qualify as "backseast moderating" under the posted rules?

"Back-seat Moderators: If members note a possible problem, they are welcome to bring it to the attention of a moderator or administrator via a private message. However, members are asked to not act as "back-seat moderators"; please do not make moderation-related comments in board threads. Members who consistently "act" as moderators may receive infractions."

Isn't this back-seat moderating?

 

[Dr. Jones]

Isn't this back-seat moderating?

... and this.

 

[Dr. Jones]

... and this.

... and this.

 

[Fishsticks]

... and this.

Ah....this is how you get 10,000 plus posts

 

[Dr. Jones]

Ah....this is how you get 10,000 plus posts

Knew that was coming .. and, no, I don't do that .. except just then ..

but admit it, it was pure brilliance.

(I'll buy you a beer if you say it was brilliant)

 

[Stifle Tower]

Isn't this back-seat moderating?

Don't think so. I've simply posted a direct quote from the rules.

If you call my post "backseat moderating" where does it stop? Would your questioning my questioning be considered backseast moderating?


But no worries, PKM...you're one of the good ones.

 

[Dr. Jones]

Don't think so. I've simply posted a direct quote from the rules.

If you call my post "backseat moderating" where does it stop? Would your questioning my questioning be considered backseast moderating?

ummmmm ...