I have two currently active ones, two expired ones.
My newest one just happened apparently, because I posted Ross Siler's tweet likening Raja Bell's whining to a scene from Half Baked. Even though it was an external link with a NSFW warning.
Eat me, mods.
You are too nice. I'm sure you have zero.
Is that how you all see me? As nice?
I see myself as not caring about all this enough to fight over it. You guys want to think something different then god bless. No skin off my nose. I know what I know and I am comfortable with that.
What a swell guy!
Is that how you all see me? As nice?
I see myself as not caring about all this enough to fight over it. You guys want to think something different then god bless. No skin off my nose. I know what I know and I am comfortable with that.
Ok your a dick face.
4 now, just got a new one.
It's been a long held practice here that anything you link to is subject to the same rules. And no, putting a warning on it does nothing to exempt you from this (also a long held practice).
What's you do?
I got one a long time ago for providing a link to facts about the male reproductive organ. Nothing explicit, really. I mean after the infraction I went back and looked at the link again and it did acknowledge that people sometimes take matters into their own hands (trying hard not to get an infraction here), but I doubt that was what did it. Those dirty dicks on that web site said the real name of a pee-pee. Don't they have any standards?