What's new

How many infractions do you have?

I have two currently active ones, two expired ones.

My newest one just happened apparently, because I posted Ross Siler's tweet likening Raja Bell's whining to a scene from Half Baked. Even though it was an external link with a NSFW warning.

Eat me, mods.

It's been a long held practice here that anything you link to is subject to the same rules. And no, putting a warning on it does nothing to exempt you from this (also a long held practice).
 
You are too nice. I'm sure you have zero.

Is that how you all see me? As nice?

I see myself as not caring about all this enough to fight over it. You guys want to think something different then god bless. No skin off my nose. I know what I know and I am comfortable with that.
 
Is that how you all see me? As nice?

I see myself as not caring about all this enough to fight over it. You guys want to think something different then god bless. No skin off my nose. I know what I know and I am comfortable with that.

What a swell guy!
 
Is that how you all see me? As nice?

I see myself as not caring about all this enough to fight over it. You guys want to think something different then god bless. No skin off my nose. I know what I know and I am comfortable with that.


Ok you are a dick face.
 
Some of you are lying your asses off. You need to add your infractions and warnings from your 'other' accounts.
 
1KYqc.jpg
 
I got one a long time ago for providing a link to facts about the male reproductive organ. Nothing explicit, really. I mean after the infraction I went back and looked at the link again and it did acknowledge that people sometimes take matters into their own hands (trying hard not to get an infraction here), but I doubt that was what did it. Those dirty dicks on that web site said the real name of a pee-pee. Don't they have any standards?
 
I got one a long time ago for providing a link to facts about the male reproductive organ. Nothing explicit, really. I mean after the infraction I went back and looked at the link again and it did acknowledge that people sometimes take matters into their own hands (trying hard not to get an infraction here), but I doubt that was what did it. Those dirty dicks on that web site said the real name of a pee-pee. Don't they have any standards?

Dude you are my friend and all but if you want to look at those pics then just go ahead and do it. No reason to hide behind "science".
 
5 .. only 1 still active.

I got all of mine because my great looks and high degree of intellect is too often found intimidating to others. Or it was for insulting other members .. one of those.
 
Back
Top