What's new

How many of us are gay? And what do Jazzfanz think about it?

Honest and confidential: how many of Jazzfanz are gay?

  • I'm gay.

    Votes: 2 7.7%
  • I'm straight.

    Votes: 25 96.2%

  • Total voters
    26
I don't know how many Jazzfanzers are gay but I would bet half are transvestites.

Don't deny it

transvestites_00.jpg


while scrolling down. i almost **** my pants.

thought is was a pic of me
 
The stats are really interesting and hard to nail down. The 10% number originally came from the Kinsey Reports, and is still often quoted today. On the other hand, Wikipedia is telling me that a 2012 US survey had 3.8% of Americans self-identifying as gay. There's a breakdown by state, pretty interesting:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

Utah is 47th in % of gay people with 2.7%. The highest? Washington D.C. by a mile at 10%. OMG, they're taking over the government! :D

Personally I think the overall % of gay people is probably between those 4% and 10% numbers -- the former being based on self-identification (which many won't want to do), the latter based on detailed personal interviews. Maybe split the difference at 7%?
 
I personally take offense to this pole. There is no option for hermaphrodites. Should I be labeled as gay because I can technically choose either? Choosing straight could be an option for me. It is hard to dress up as a man because I have to tape down my huge chest to conform to society norms rather than dress as a woman and tuck. What to do? What do I do? I am tired of being called a tranny and labeled by gay or straight standards.
 
gays and lesbies make the best tenants. Never had any skip out on rent or trash the place.

still a shame we have inundated our food packaging with phytoestrogens, turning men into pansies and women into rage bees with breast cancer issues.

no amount of sociological, political, or legal "calming" can create real men and real women.

uhhhhh. . . .. wait a minute. . . . . .


when I was growing up the thing I saw was "real men" going out on a binge on payday night, coming home soused and broke with the smell of skanky women and cigarettes, and powerless wives who feared the gossip mills too much go out and match that act. I don't see much of that any more, not since the movie "Cowboys Don't Cry" came out. What a great DVD combo, that and "The Show He Never Gave". (Hank Williams)

Gay can't be all that bad.

Package food and pasteurized milk are only thing more deadly to put into child than autism making vaccine.
 
I personally take offense to this pole. There is no option for hermaphrodites. Should I be labeled as gay because I can technically choose either? Choosing straight could be an option for me. It is hard to dress up as a man because I have to tape down my huge chest to conform to society norms rather than dress as a woman and tuck. What to do? What do I do? I am tired of being called a tranny and labeled by gay or straight standards.

Play to advantage. Dress like girl to make boys like you then whip it out in bed. Say to them it is only small her my peen and you can keep it out of way.
 
Let me get this straight.

oops. wrong thread. for a second I was imagining I was still in the low IQ thread. . . . .
 
[size/HUGE] boobs [/size];904079 said:
Package food and pasteurized milk are only thing more deadly to put into child than autism making vaccine.

many packaging plastics, and even the coating on the inside of steel cans, contain one or more of several known phytoestrogenic chemicals as an ingredient of the plastic, which are actually mobile enough to leak out into the food. Given a shelf life of a few years, the cans are the worst offenders. . . . pop bottles are also pretty bad, because, essentially, the product is considered to have an unlimited shelf life. . . .

This is actually several orders of magnitude more concerning that "pasteurized" milk processing, which denatures some proteins and eliminates some beneficial bacterial strains, such as those found in cheese, yogurt, and cottage cheese. The concern some folks have regarding denatured proteins being absorbed, and causing some autoimmune reactions/illnesses, is simply not proven, but possible.

the mercury as well as the "host protein materials" in the vaccines are just as concerning. . . . and not proven. . . . . .

The phytoestrogenic effects are proven. No studies have been done, either epidemiologically or in the lab on relevant "doses", however. But unlike the dose/response curve seen with radiation, there are no known defense strategies/inducible systems for removing low levels of extraneous phytoestrogenic chemicals, and it is so far as we can speculate entirely probable that in this case there are linear dose/response effects, and perhaps even an amplified effect. . . .over a long time span.

This is I think why we are seeing observed effects in nature, and even in human measures of sexual differentiation. Men are becoming more effeminate on the measure of the distance between the genitals and the ****, and not just because of the use we make of these anatomical features. In gross morphology of the human body.

and I think the filter on this site needs some tweaking so we can use proper anatomical terminology.
 
Back
Top