ICE Shooting in Minnesota
- Thread starter LogGrad98
- Start date
LogGrad98
Well-Known Member
Contributor
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
To be fair it isn't really a slogan that was ever used word for word in Nazi germany. Hitler did take a policy stance of "1 for 100", meaning a single death will be met with 100 deaths, sometimes expressed as 1 for 1000, but that was obviously metaphorical, but the intent is very clear. But I did hear this uttered in my college german classes in the german (Einer von uns, alle von ihnen) as basically a rallying quote of sorts among the military leadership and soldiers, not really even a rallying cry specifically, just a means of stating "this is how we do business", specifically in the SS, in Nazi germany. Kind of like "all for one and one for all" but specifically intended to imply deaths will occur. So the claims this is a word for word quote from Nazi germany is wrong, but the sentiment was rampant among the german military leaders all the way to Hitler. Still disturbing to see something that obviously has its origins in Nazi ideology displayed that prominently.
Red
Well-Known Member
Thanks for the clarification. I also found this:
The phrase "one of ours, all of yours" was a rallying cry used by the Spanish fascist movement Falange Española in the 1930s, and it embodies the principle of collective punishment that was widely practiced by the Nazis, rather than being an official Nazi slogan itself. The sentiment translates to "one of ours is worth many of yours".
While the exact English phrase was not a direct German slogan, the underlying principle of brutal retaliation and collective punishment was a hallmark of the Nazi regime's actions, particularly in occupied territories.
Red
Well-Known Member
The Daily Beast has a paywall, but the video can be viewed:
www.thedailybeast.com
Trump, 79, Answers Simple Question With Bizarre Word Salad
The president dodged the question before giving a confused answer.
Red
Well-Known Member
Red
Well-Known Member
It’s the militarization of American streets that really can’t stand forever.
View: https://x.com/noturtlesoup17/status/2011148947411407258
View: https://x.com/YourAnonCentral/status/2010517012993216879
View: https://x.com/noturtlesoup17/status/2011148947411407258
View: https://x.com/YourAnonCentral/status/2010517012993216879
Last edited:
Like honestly how many of those useless fat ****ers does it take to violate people's civil rights? There's like 20 of them to beat one dude and a women up, have some professional standards.
I've violated a fair few people's rights in my time and I've enjoyed it immensely but I've always for the most part done it on my own. Look on occasion a few of us have stomped the same guy at the same time but you know FOMO.
Its not just that they're thugs, they're ****ing amateur thugs.
Red
Well-Known Member
The woman killed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent in Minneapolis last week served on the board of her son’s school, which linked to documents encouraging parents to monitor ICE and directing them to training.
The documents shed new light on Renee Good’s connection to efforts to monitor and potentially disrupt ICE operations – an association that federal officials have made clear is at the center of their review into the deadly incident that occurred as she partially blocked ICE agents in the street with her SUV.
But four legal experts who reviewed the documents for CNN said they largely describe nonviolent civil disobedience tactics practiced at American protests for generations – far from the sinister depiction of extremism and domestic terrorism portrayed by Trump administration officials like Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Vice President JD Vance.
“There’s nothing in there that suggests attacking ICE agents or engaging in any other form of physical harm or property damage,” said Timothy Zick, a professor at William and Mary Law School who wrote a book on protest law. “This is authoritarianism 101 where you blame the dissenters and the activists for causing their own death.”
———————————
In order to not be dishonored, federal prosecuters are resigning:
Federal prosecutors quit in protest over lack of investigation into ICE shooting
Six lawyers from US attorney’s office in Minnesota quit along with four leaders of DoJ’s civil rights division
www.theguardian.com
A wave of federal prosecutors in Minnesota and Washington DC have resigned in protest over the justice department’s decision not to hold a civil rights investigation into the fatal shooting of an unarmed US citizen by a federal immigration agent in Minneapolis.
Six lawyers from the US attorney’s office in Minnesota quit on Tuesday over the department’s reluctance to investigate the shooter of Renee Nicole Good, the New York Times reported.
Among them is Joseph H Thompson, who was second in command at the office and led a large-scale fraud inquiry last year that led in part to the Trump administration sending a surge of immigration agents into the state.
Thompson and his colleagues, the Times said, were upset at senior justice department officials demanding a criminal inquiry into any ties between Good and her widow, Becca, into activist groups; and the refusal of the FBI to allow state investigators to join its investigation of the shooting.
Separately, four leaders of a crucial division in the US justice department have also resigned. The lawyers left the civil rights division, which has a criminal investigations unit that investigates the use of force by police officers, according to MS Now, citing three people it said were briefed about the departures.
The resignations follow a decision by Harmeet Dhillon, the Trump administration-aligned assistant attorney general for civil rights, not to investigate the 7 January killing of Good by Jonathan Ross, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent.
Dhillon told the unit the week before that it would not be involved in any investigation, Reuters reported a source as saying.
On Tuesday, deputy attorney general Todd Blanche said in a statement: “There is currently no basis for a criminal civil rights investigation.” The statement, first reported by CNN, did not elaborate on how the department had reached a conclusion that no investigation was warranted.