What's new

I'd rather have Korver at the two than hayward

Korver > Hayward

Hayward is a shooting guard, who can not shoot. Dude is like 25 percent from the 3 thats just horrible. Only thing he is doing suprisingly well is rebounding, 4.5 assitst did not count if you have 3 turnovers a game and scoring 16 points on 40 percent shooting is not enough,too.
 
Hayward is a shooting guard, who can not shoot. Dude is like 25 percent from the 3 thats just horrible. Only thing he is doing suprisingly well is rebounding, 4.5 assitst did not count if you have 3 turnovers a game and scoring 16 points on 40 percent shooting is not enough,too.

It's all about roles though. Hayward shot over 40% last year. We know what he can do.
 
But Hayward is a better 3 point shooter than Korver...at least that's what my friend b_line told me. When it's all said and done, Hayward will be known as one of the deadliest shooters ever to step foot on a basketball court...you watch.
 
But Hayward is a better 3 point shooter than Korver...at least that's what my friend b_line told me. When it's all said and done, Hayward will be known as one of the deadliest shooters ever to step foot on a basketball court...you watch.

this is lol

That just happened.
 
Hayward is a shooting guard, who can not shoot. Dude is like 25 percent from the 3 thats just horrible. Only thing he is doing suprisingly well is rebounding, 4.5 assitst did not count if you have 3 turnovers a game and scoring 16 points on 40 percent shooting is not enough,too.

This
 
LOL. Been there and done that. Hayward is a much better complete player. If Korver was in the same roll Hayward is right now Korver would be much worse.
 
Not that this has anything, really, to do with the thread, but Korver was rather underappreciated. He was our best defensive wing (this includes the beloved Kirilenko) but often go overlooked and stereotyped for, what I can only assume, is the "white guy who shoots = unathletic and bad defender" stigma.
 
Back
Top