Do we have any evidence for the ‘Ryan wants to win’ narrative other than all of us collectively assuming that the basketball decision is to lose, and we project that on the one we assume to be the professionally reasonable person (GM) and assume that Ryan is the fan whose emotions cloud business decisions?I’m pretty sure Austin Ainge's main goal this season is to get one of the top prospects from next year’s draft, but Ryan has somewhat tied his hands. Austin knows that this draft is special. With four (possibly more) #1 prospects in it, the opportunity for a tanking team to land a future star has never been better. But he’s in a tough spot now. He may have to trade Lauri. Or maybe I’m wrong about him. Maybe he says screw the draft and the odds, borrows his dad's hunting gear, and goes big-game hunting.
Is it possible that perhaps the Ainge’s really have a more blasé attitude toward it than us as fans would be comfortable with? Because to me, the FO’s job for tanking isn’t to tell the coach to tank, it’s to hamstring the coach. Why would Ainge need to trade for Nurkic to “balance the roster” if we’re tanking?
My brief is that the Ainge’s come from an experiential bias that tells them things magically coalesce, and when we as fans get baffled by some really short-sighted management issues, it’s easier for us to blame that on Ryan than face the reality that perhaps these short-sighted business decisions are really coming from the guys we’re trusting to be the rational decision makers.