What's new

I'm all in for getting Gay

Same thing with Rudy Gay. But Gay is not going to cost the max.

Rudy Gay is a liability though.. He'll be in a contract year.. I'm extremely doubtful they head in that direction.. Barnes seems like a MUCH better fit in almost every facet IMO..

Plus the Jazz have $$ to spend if the cap is going to be 92mil, and Gay will cost more tangible assets. ((Assets that could be better off spent moving up in the draft??)
 
Last night, without the King of Gravity, Barnes shot 1 - 10.

6 points 5 rbs.

It's extremely hard to max a player who's currently the 4th option.
 
Last edited:
Last night, with out the King of Gravity, Barnes shot 1 - 10.

6 points 5 rbs.

It's extremely hard to max a player who's currently the 4th option.

I think maxing Barnes would be a mistake. We pretty much all agree that we need a 3/4 though.
 
Last night, with out the King of Gravity, Barnes shot 1 - 10.

6 points 5 rbs.

It's extremely hard to max a player who's currently the 4th option.

Did you see the one make though?? He left James Harden in the dust on a faceup move
 
Did you see the one make though?? He left James Harden in the dust on a faceup move

And that's all he's ever been since North Carolina, just flashes here and there. Of course Hayward was 24 when he had his
breakout year, so don't want to write Barnes off yet as an eternal role player.
 
I think maxing Barnes would be a mistake. We pretty much all agree that we need a 3/4 though.
Yes maxing Barnes would be a monumental mistake for the franchise. A lot of us don't think Hayward is worth the "new" max, why would we spend that on a lesser player?
 
Back
Top