What's new

I'm going on the record: If biden enters the presidentia racel......

if Biden enters the race and wins the general election. obama will get his 3rd term.

how u may ask.
biden will resign allowing vice president Obama to have a 3rd term.

so obummer can secure his "legacy" like stopping obummer care from being repealed.
and continuing the iran deal.


i hope i am wrong and i will eat lots of crow.


but liberals if u want a 3rd term for obummer you gotta VOTE for BIDEN!


obama-run-this-country-obama-self.png




what say you my friends.
 
if Biden enters the race and wins the general election. obama will get his 3rd term.

how u may ask.
biden will resign allowing vice president Obama to have a 3rd term.

so obummer can secure his "legacy" like stopping obummer care from being repealed.
and continuing the iran deal.


i hope i am wrong and i will eat lots of crow.


but liberals if u want a 3rd term for obummer you gotta VOTE for BIDEN!

what say you my friends.

Yes, but No.
Biden would not 'undo' any of the recent exec orders and prez memos (more memos than orders...)
and it would be a 'continuation' of the Obama administration...
But, No, Obama would not take VP, or come in through back door...
He's setting up shop to be a non-elected force, continuing to push and maintain his agenda, after 2016.
He will not 'fade away' as has been polite protocol.
 
Think it is more likely than ever that Biden gets in.
HC is going down, I'm flipping to 20/80 that she survives the FBI investigation...
Some of it may be Obama Admin will not / cannot / probably doesn't want to, cover for her on this anymore...
and Dems need a viable candidate. Biden is at top of list, and by default (without Obama saying anything) has Obama Admin support, and may even use the Obama campaign infrastructure, which has been maintained well beyond the last election
 
Wouldn't it be nice if there were a way we could ban Dutch from starting new threads?
OK, that's mean. Sorry Dutch.

Or at least new threads that are filled with typos and spelling errors and overuse of exclamation points and eliipses?
 
Wouldn't it be nice if there were a way we could ban Dutch from starting new threads?
OK, that's mean. Sorry Dutch.

Or at least new threads that are filled with typos and spelling errors and overuse of exclamation points and eliipses?

I'd be in favor of a rule change that makes this possible.

Yes, even if it would put me on the block too.
 
Biden is one of the few on the left who are qualified to run anything more advanced than a pencil sharpener. I'd be torn between voting for him or Hillary. That guy is one of the sharpest minds in politics. Too bad the nation is too dumb to recognize brilliance.
 
The forum's two worst posters, by far, circle jerking. I'm ashamed for you, Roach. HH can drink gas.


Thanks for the retaliatory neg too. Only D-Bags do that.
 
The forum's two worst posters, by far, circle jerking. I'm ashamed for you, Roach. HH can drink gas.


Thanks for the retaliatory neg too. Only D-Bags do that.

"So what about what others think"
"Completely made up facts"
"..while you look down your nose at"

The forums biggest hypocrite in his prime. Good show, F-town
 
Yes, but No.
Biden would not 'undo' any of the recent exec orders and prez memos (more memos than orders...)
and it would be a 'continuation' of the Obama administration...
But, No, Obama would not take VP, or come in through back door...
He's setting up shop to be a non-elected force, continuing to push and maintain his agenda, after 2016.
He will not 'fade away' as has been polite protocol.

Polite protocol? Off the top of my head, Democratic presidents have generally been very active post-presidency, at least during my lifetime. Well, except Kennedy. Republicans generally sit back on a beach earning 20%. Think about it:
Nixon: Went dark, for obvious reasons
Ford: Went dark
Carter: Active in building houses for the poor, writing books, and helping make the world a more peaceful place
Reagan: Went dark, but then, he had alzheimers.
Bush: Went dark
Clinton: Was briefly quiet, and then has worked (in a different way) to make the world a better place.
Bush II: Went dark
 
Polite protocol? Off the top of my head, Democratic presidents have generally been very active post-presidency, at least during my lifetime. Well, except Kennedy. Republicans generally sit back on a beach earning 20%. Think about it:
Nixon: Went dark, for obvious reasons
Ford: Went dark
Carter: Active in building houses for the poor, writing books, and helping make the world a more peaceful place
Reagan: Went dark, but then, he had alzheimers.
Bush: Went dark
Clinton: Was briefly quiet, and then has worked (in a different way) to make the world a better place.
Bush II: Went dark

Like the way you twisted this, but hey, my fault, I should have been more specific... polite political protocol.

As for your list, it is very biased and very incorrect, as I'm learning, should be expected...

I can't stand Carter as president or since, but yes, he has been involved in significant charity work. Good for him.

Clinton has clearly raised the most money... to be used for making the world a better place... but unfortunately, 90% of it goes for himself. Ya know, he truly believes 'charity begins at home'. Even his claimed charity donations... most ALL of it was paid to the Clinton foundation. $14M tax write-off so you can spend $12.5M on yourself, through the foundation. Don't ya just love the US tax code and how the rich can keep their money...

Bush II: Very, very dark on the political front, despite being said to be responsible for every single thing Obama can blame him for for 6+ years... but anything but dark on the charity front.
Airlift Research Foundation
Clinton Bush Haiti Fund
Kids Wish Network
National Park Foundation
Operation Smile
PeacePlayers International
Red Cross
Susan G. Komen for the Cure
The Salvation Army

...not to mention all that Laura Bush has been involved with.
but, I've said too much. You've made up your mind a long time ago, but please open it to some facts.
 
Back
Top