What's new
By:

Integrity?

Well?

  • Total voters
    15
I would be super happy to win 20 of the last 48 games if it was not Marvin and Jefferson getting all of the floor time. They are playing way to much. Especially Jefferson. I see Marvin as a possible piece of this team next year. But there is no way in hell Jefferson is part of our future and should not be playing near as many minutes as he is.
 
It is a great thing that the Jazz have it. Sometimes it gets in the way of getting what you really want. Such as this year and a #1 pick.

But I voted yes as I tried to look at the past, present and future.
 
bigb said:
What the hell is wrong with you?

I can't believe this is happening, but I agree with HH here.






Now someone shoot me and put me out of my misery.
Click to expand...

well ur not a no-good filthy dirty mod overlord anymore so we can be bros bro.
what are yalls fav types of cheese? im tryin to get into dat fancy cheese life. i got some pretzel crisps that are da ****.
 
gregbroncs said:
I would be super happy to win 20 of the last 48 games if it was not Marvin and Jefferson getting all of the floor time. They are playing way to much. Especially Jefferson. I see Marvin as a possible piece of this team next year. But there is no way in hell Jefferson is part of our future and should not be playing near as many minutes as he is.
Click to expand...

The Jazz could cut or trade Marvin and the Jazz would still be able to re-sign him next year.
 
I see tanking as a business decision. What does it have to do with integrity? If you throw games on purpose, yes. I don't see the Popovich method as lacking integrity. I see it as highly intelligent. If you rest guys with minor injuries in a more conservative fashion, or change minute allotments for developmental purposes because that is the greatest benefit for your team/business that year I don't see the lack of integrity. Its the difference between what I want now and what I want most.

I'm sure there are those that disagree, but this is my feeling.
 
What's wrong with giving Burks, Kanter, Gobert, Rush, Garrett way more minutes...we're trying to get them more experience so we can chase a championship in the coming years, there's a lot of integrity in doing that. I don't see the integrity in giving players that won't be here next season all the playing time at the expense of guys that will be the future of the team.
 
akirac73 said:
What's wrong with giving Burks, Kanter, Gobert, Rush, Garrett way more minutes...we're trying to get them more experience so we can chase a championship in the coming years, there's a lot of integrity in doing that. I don't see the integrity in giving players that won't be here next season all the playing time at the expense of guys that will be the future of the team.
Click to expand...

Who knows who will be on the team next year? RJ won't be back, but the Jazz committed to playing him when they traded for him. Marvin could well be re-signed. Younger guys could be traded for other assets. Just try to enjoy watching your team play, win or lose.

IMO, winning is the best experience.
 
NUMBERICA said:
The Jazz could cut or trade Marvin and the Jazz would still be able to re-sign him next year.
Click to expand...
Why the **** would he want to come back after that. Believing what you wrote here is living in a fantasy world. So no they would not be able to do what you are saying.
 
The guy loves beer and boobs.
Click to expand...

That's cool. But he doesn't like cheese. What are we, animals? < Self answering question.
Of course we are or we wouldn't like beer and boobs.
I call them the trinity. Beer, Boobs and Cheese.
 
akirac73 said:
What's wrong with giving Burks, Kanter, Gobert, Rush, Garrett way more minutes...we're trying to get them more experience so we can chase a championship in the coming years, there's a lot of integrity in doing that. I don't see the integrity in giving players that won't be here next season all the playing time at the expense of guys that will be the future of the team.
Click to expand...
Im sure Rush, at 28 years old is not getting.younger as time goes on....
 
Cheese is almost always the right answer, but I think I would not be much of a fan of an organization that does not operate on a foundation of basic integrity. In the end, that is the only thing that you have that you must choose to give up, that someone cannot take from you, and that defines you as a human being. In my opinion.
 
The Fresh Prince said:
Im sure Rush, at 28 years old is not getting.younger as time goes on....
Click to expand...
LOL...you got me there. I still think we should "test drive" Rush a lot more so we get a clear idea if he's worth keeping or dumping in the trash heap. I don't think we've seen enough of him to really know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top