What's new

Interesting old article about Corbin and Kanter

I still remember the games where they would be up in the 4th quarter and they would, for some odd reason, have the entire crunch team lineup consist of D-League players.
 
I just don't see that much talent on the team. Their 2nd best player is Lee and their best player is a 3pt shooting PG. I guess I just don't like anyone on their team, besides Bogut, but I don't expect him to maintain health. People talk about them giving their young players the ropes, but all their young players are kind of mediocre besides Thompson (not really considering Curry a "young" player since it's his 4th year starting).

Solid answer. I suspected you had more reason than merely karma.
 
I still remember the games where they would be up in the 4th quarter and they would, for some odd reason, have the entire crunch team lineup consist of D-League players.

They did have some legitimate injuries. Lee had some sort of minor sugery near the end of the season as an example. Who knows how bad Steph Curry's ankle really was. The Warriors sure as hell didn't want him to come back. The prime example of the tanking was in the last two games of the season. In the 4 or 5 games before that, Klay Thompson was playing around 40 mpg. But in the second to last game against the Hornets, he only played 28 minutes and sat out the whole 4th quarter in an 83-81 loss. Then in their final game of the season against the Spurs's scrubs, Thompson played 29 minutes and again sat out the whole 4th quarter.
 
They did have some legitimate injuries. Lee had some sort of minor sugery near the end of the season as an example. Who knows how bad Steph Curry's ankle really was. The Warriors sure as hell didn't want him to come back. The prime example of the tanking was in the last two games of the season. In the 4 or 5 games before that, Klay Thompson was playing around 40 mpg. But in the second to last game against the Hornets, he only played 28 minutes and sat out the whole 4th quarter in an 83-81 loss. Then in their final game of the season against the Spurs's scrubs, Thompson played 29 minutes and again sat out the whole 4th quarter.

I wanted to also say that another reason I don't like the Warriors is that I despise Mark Jackson. He led a locker room mutiny during his season in Utah, I didn't really care for him as an ESPN analyst, he was conceited to the point that he refused to work his way through the ranks as an assistant coach, and he completely played along with the Warriors tanking, at least in the last two games of the season. There was no logical reason to sit Thompson out the whole 4th quarter those last two games if they were trying to win.
 
Does anybody doubt that, at some point, we could have swapped Al for an injured Bogut? As of today, would anybody rather have Al?

For all the apologists' praise over O'LongConner's patience (for which he does deserve credit), it remains true that we've been dragging around an unbalanced roster AND HE HASN'T BEEN ABLE TO MAKE A DEAL TO MAKE THE TEAM BETTER.

It would be awesome to have Bogut returning to OUR roster, with the younguns having seen major minutes in his downtime. Then it'd be awesome to deal Millsap at this time and proceed with Bogut-Kanter-Favors.
 
The article is off a newspaper somewhere I am sure. Just says that kanter has been playing less than expected and only played 5 the other jight. Some stupid comment from corbin, the obilgatory jazz will more than likely trade al or paul to make room.

As I watch gs they are good this year for two reasons. Jack and landry. Those guys are beasting hard this year.
 
The article is off a newspaper somewhere I am sure. Just says that kanter has been playing less than expected and only played 5 the other jight. Some stupid comment from corbin, the obilgatory jazz will more than likely trade al or paul to make room.

As I watch gs they are good this year for two reasons. Jack and landry. Those guys are beasting hard this year.

Don't forget Steph Curry. It takes a special player to shoot 45% on 3's at such a high volume (7 3PA's/game).
 
Does anybody doubt that, at some point, we could have swapped Al for an injured Bogut? As of today, would anybody rather have Al?

For all the apologists' praise over O'LongConner's patience (for which he does deserve credit), it remains true that we've been dragging around an unbalanced roster AND HE HASN'T BEEN ABLE TO MAKE A DEAL TO MAKE THE TEAM BETTER.

It would be awesome to have Bogut returning to OUR roster, with the younguns having seen major minutes in his downtime. Then it'd be awesome to deal Millsap at this time and proceed with Bogut-Kanter-Favors.

Until he goes down for another half season with an injury.
 
Until he goes down for another half season with an injury.

Tell me the story of that white unicorn.... you know, the unrisky risk?

Or, if you don't want to tell that one, maybe you can talk about the team that became great without having to make risks (unrisky or risky risks). Let's call this the rainbow story.

Unicorns and rainbows... I'm sure you can add some dick humor to this, too. Fun times.
 
Tell me the story of that white unicorn.... you know, the unrisky risk?

Or, if you don't want to tell that one, maybe you can talk about the team that became great without having to make risks (unrisky or risky risks). Let's call this the rainbow story.

Unicorns and rainbows... I'm sure you can add some dick humor to this, too. Fun times.

I just don't think he is worth the risk.
 
Tell me the story of that white unicorn.... you know, the unrisky risk?

Or, if you don't want to tell that one, maybe you can talk about the team that became great without having to make risks (unrisky or risky risks). Let's call this the rainbow story.

Unicorns and rainbows... I'm sure you can add some dick humor to this, too. Fun times.

An unrisky risk wouldn't be a risk...
 
Back
Top