Sexual Favors
Well-Known Member
I don't think anyone is off limits, but I also don't see Burks and Kanter as value fetchers at this point. Both have had limited playing time compared to potential, that they have more value to us than someone else, IMO. Maybe I'm wrong. I just think our only value fetcher is Favors because he's more proven, plays D, and is signed to a great looking deal when you start to think about the salary cap increasing these next two years.
Hayward could move the needle for a lot of teams, but with FA being after the draft, a deal including him would be tricky.
Burke had a good rookie year compared to the other scrubs in his class, but has still left some serious questions unanswered, e.g., shooting, drawing fouls, pace, # of FGAs compared to FG % and ASTs.
Gobert hardly played. Showed great promise, but not enough to fetch his value. Given his minutes, you have to think that if another team wanted him like we do, he would've been drafted before the 27th pick.
My $.02
Hayward could move the needle for a lot of teams, but with FA being after the draft, a deal including him would be tricky.
Burke had a good rookie year compared to the other scrubs in his class, but has still left some serious questions unanswered, e.g., shooting, drawing fouls, pace, # of FGAs compared to FG % and ASTs.
Gobert hardly played. Showed great promise, but not enough to fetch his value. Given his minutes, you have to think that if another team wanted him like we do, he would've been drafted before the 27th pick.
My $.02