I am inspired from the following article:
https://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/jazz/51580243-87/hayward-games-jazz-points.html.csp
On one hand its true that hayward is good at many things but not great at a specific side of the game. He isnt a great athlete like wade, shooter like korver, defender like artest, or whatever u can think of. But i think its better to be good at many things and not have a weakness imo. And this kid has a really great basketball iq that makes him different than most of the other players.
My only hesitation is whether he will be able to respond to the future responsibilities and be a superstar or will be a very good all around player but not jump to the next level. I wonder how everyone see his future in jazz, as the next hornacek or better?
https://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/jazz/51580243-87/hayward-games-jazz-points.html.csp
On one hand its true that hayward is good at many things but not great at a specific side of the game. He isnt a great athlete like wade, shooter like korver, defender like artest, or whatever u can think of. But i think its better to be good at many things and not have a weakness imo. And this kid has a really great basketball iq that makes him different than most of the other players.
My only hesitation is whether he will be able to respond to the future responsibilities and be a superstar or will be a very good all around player but not jump to the next level. I wonder how everyone see his future in jazz, as the next hornacek or better?