What's new

Is Isiah Collier finally our new Stockton?

I still love watching this guy play. It's fun to watch and I miss the pass first point guard.

Looking at the game from a 50,000 foot view I do wonder if we slowly revert back to a more traditional style of play, a la pass-first PG's and the big-man being more "en vogue."

The small-ball era was fun and novel with the advent of the Warriors in the mid 2010's and clearly the league followed suit to fight fire with fire. Since the apex of the Splash Brothers (2015-2019) I will argue the on-floor product has meaningfully devolved and is frankly generally awful to watch (this is a personal option that is somewhat supported broadly based on ratings #'s).

Generally, I think major "style of play" changes are driven by transcendent talents. Shaq was the driver of the "big man" era; the Steph - Klay (+ Durant later) was the driver of the "3-pt barrage" era; et cetera. But the league can, and historically has, implemented some changes in terms of rules / the adjudication of the game to alter the product on the floor.

IMO - the NBA is learning it has over-indexed on the popularity of points, 3pt shooting, offense, etc. and the NBA game has lost its soul in a sense, relative to peak popularity in the 80's - 00's. Not sure what it will look like but I do think things "swing back" in some way, at some point.
 
Looking at the game from a 50,000 foot view I do wonder if we slowly revert back to a more traditional style of play, a la pass-first PG's and the big-man being more "en vogue."

Doesn’t sound like it, as much as I share the nostalgia. Sounds like what Hardy wants to build is an extremely fast, sprinting, quick decision, lots-of-open-3s offense and an aggressive, hands everywhere “swarm” defense.

It’s quite smart actually. Use the youth and athleticism of the guys, with half the games at altitude, to Tazmanian Devil the entire 48 minutes.

Sounds like its own kind of sloppy, chaotic fun.
 
Hardy's defense is incredibly passive and his entire scheme is to lay off perimeter players to force them to take wide open above the break threes.
 
10 APG would be great in a vacuum. The question becomes are we better with ~6-7 APG from a guy who will contribute more scoring / better shooting. My guess would be yes.

I yearn for the old school days but as others have pointed out the game done changed.
 
10 APG would be great in a vacuum. The question becomes are we better with ~6-7 APG from a guy who will contribute more scoring / better shooting. My guess would be yes.

I yearn for the old school days but as others have pointed out the game done changed.
no question. he has to be able to shoot.
 
Back
Top