What's new
By:

Is Quin blowing it with Dante?

Stoked said:
Why? I trust Snyder. If he thinks Exum is not the right choice than he isn't.

Why do you disagree?
Click to expand...

I don't necessarily disagree, it just seems like good timing to give him a serious go.
 
I think yesterday Quin put Mack in thinking we might need more scoring, but it looked like Dante was just warming up and ready to be aggressive.

It's important for Dante's development to end the season on a high note. How much should that factor, if at all?
 
Because he made a lucky three?

I mean it isn't like Mack and Neto are lighting the world on fire. I don't think this is the time you throw a guy like Exum in the fire.
 
str8line said:
I think yesterday Quin put Mack in thinking we might need more scoring, but it looked like Dante was just warming up and ready to be aggressive. I think it's important for Dante's development to end the season on a high note.
Click to expand...

What if he ****s the bed... I mean he makes the nuclear turnover on the regular. I think chances for his success are like less than 25% and his chances for a huge mistake are better than 25%.
 
I would have liked to have seen him play a bit prior to last night, but I thought the minutes distribution last night was perfect and he did a solid job. I'd like to see him get 7-10 minutes a game from here on out, if possible. Playoff experience will good for him. Plus, the less Shelvin the better, IMO.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
What if he ****s the bed... I mean he makes the nuclear turnover on the regular. I think chances for his success are like less than 25% and his chances for a huge mistake are better than 25%.
Click to expand...

Look at Kobe vs. Jazz during the 1997 playoffs. Granted, much different situation/player but I bet it made Kobe a better player to fail a bit like that. The occasional good play makes up for it development-wise. Impact on the game is a slightly different matter, of course...
 
Last edited:
CALJAZZFAN said:
I would have liked to have seen him play a bit prior to last night, but I thought the minutes distribution last night was perfect and he did a solid job. I'd like to see him get 7-10 minutes a game from here on out, if possible. Playoff experience will good for him. Plus, the less Shelvin the better, IMO.
Click to expand...

He probably would not have played if Hayward wasn't sick.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
What if he ****s the bed... I mean he makes the nuclear turnover on the regular. I think chances for his success are like less than 25% and his chances for a huge mistake are better than 25%.
Click to expand...

Statistically he is better than Mack so I think he chances of continuing to be better than Mack are very high, especially when you compare their play post all-star break. Its pretty easy to put him in and if he is really struggling take him out. His defense would have been useful in game 3. I think the coaching staff has made a mistake not giving him more minutes but I was happy to see him playing in game 4.
 
str8line said:
Look at Kobe vs. Jazz during the 1997 playoffs. Granted, much different situation/player but I bet it made Kobe a better player to fail a bit like that. The occasional good play makes up for it development-wise. Impact on the game is a slightly different matter of course...
Click to expand...

I thought we had moved past the Exum/Kobe comps by now. Srs stahp
 
Ron Mexico said:
Statistically he is better than Mack so I think he chances of continuing to be better than Mack are very high, especially when you compare their play post all-star break. Its pretty easy to put him in and if he is really struggling take him out. His defense would have been useful in game 3. I think the coaching staff has made a mistake not giving him more minutes but I was happy to see him playing in game 4.
Click to expand...

post all-star break? You mean, for the stretch of games in which Mack was injured?

You Exum fanboys are nuts. I haven't given up on the kid (far from it), but acting like he obviously belongs in this series is just dumb
 
Ron Mexico said:
Statistically he is better than Mack so I think he chances of continuing to be better than Mack are very high, especially when you compare their play post all-star break. Its pretty easy to put him in and if he is really struggling take him out. His defense would have been useful in game 3. I think the coaching staff has made a mistake not giving him more minutes but I was happy to see him playing in game 4.
Click to expand...

It's not straight stats to me. I know Mack will eff up too, but Dante throws a pass or two that end up going the other way for layups. He does it with enough frequency that he can't be the pg or primary ball handler. If he plays good defense and is off ball on offense then sure, but I think if you need a pg... go with Mack or Neto.
 
str8line said:
Look at Kobe vs. Jazz during the 1997 playoffs. Granted, much different situation/player but I bet it made Kobe a better player to fail a bit like that. The occasional good play makes up for it development-wise. Impact on the game is a slightly different matter, of course...
Click to expand...

I doubt that was why he was successful or had any meaningful impact on his career at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top