No way I'm taking Parker over Wiggins.
The argument for Parker over Wiggins is based on the belief that Parker would stay in Utah for 10 years as the face of the franchise. Whereas, other guys might leave on a player option year.
The argument for Parker over Wiggins is mainly based on the belief that Parker would stay in Utah for 10 years as the face of the franchise. Whereas, other guys might leave on a player option year.
That's just the reality of getting a superstar to play in Utah long term.
That said, Parker is legitimately the #2 player in this draft for a lot of teams.
The argument for Parker over Wiggins is mainly based on the belief that Parker would stay in Utah for 10 years as the face of the franchise. Whereas, other guys might leave on a player option year.
That's just the reality of getting a superstar to play in Utah long term.
That said, Parker is legitimately the #2 player in this draft for a lot of teams.
If you build a legit team, he's not going to leave. Both Westbrook and Durant seem fine in OKC and I would argue that's at least as ****ty a place as SLC, if not more so.
The idea that Parker somehow will love SLC because he's Mormon is laughable.
The logic could backfire, if Parker feels there's too much weird pressure in Utah because he is Mormon. He might rather be a Mormon somewhere else.
Durant and Westbrook don't mind being in smaller markets. They're not the guys that long to be in NY and LA, like Carmelo and Chris Paul.
If you take all these factors into consideration, then yes, Parker is the right pick for the Jazz. You get a long-term franchise player and scoring leader you can build around.
Both Wiggins and Embiid are potentially more dominant players though.
I agree with Cyrone, but Parker is reportedly #1 on DL's board.
Link?
Anything Chad Ford has said on this topic for the last 6 months.
Could be a clever smokescreen though. Jazz are good at that.
That's why I used the word 'reportedly.'
They both will be Allstars. Who cares which one we get, as long as we get one.