framer
Well-Known Member
Holy cow, if we got Khris and their 1st, I'd pass out from excitement.
If we got Khris and gave up one of our 6 second rounders I would pass out from excitement.
Holy cow, if we got Khris and their 1st, I'd pass out from excitement.
They do need bigs. They have minutes for him for sure.
I'm fine with that. Shed Burke too.
That said, our offense could be horrific without Kanter next year and abysmal without he and Burke in a major hypothetical world.
Would have liked twice if I couldbut is he down to get the friction on?
Don't be a wet blanket Mr JonesI said big, not long..
Jazz would still have Booker, one of Burks/Middleton (one starts, while the other is 6th man), Jingles, 2015 draft pick(s), the rights to Neto/Tomic and some money to add a free agent or two. I'm pretty sure they can figure out how to make it work.For serious? Give Trey's 15 shots to ANYONE else: Ingles, Millsap (well, maybe not Dante) and they make a better percentage. I agree there might be some growing pains with inserting Gobert into the lineup instead of Kanter. But also remember Burks will be the starting SG instead of Ingles or Millsap. So subtract a scorer in Kanter, but add one in Burks. I don't see a huge difference in offense. But I see a MUCH improved defense.
I think he does both pretty well but he IS employed by the Jazz.David Locke, trying to up Kanter's value:
https://weareutahjazz.com/lockedonj...der-locke-has-enes-kanter-been-underutilized/
Not saying he's wrong, per se, but this is the same guy that was ruthless on Kanter for two years and who definitely operates with the front office's interests - rather than his reader's need to be informed - as his first priority.
Not sure if this was brought up earlier, but have you all seen Sheridan's hypothesis: Lamb, a 2017 1st, and Perkins for Kanter?
Apologies if this was discussed earlier in the thread.
Thoughts on that deal?
I'm fine with that. Shed Burke too.
That said, our offense could be horrific without Kanter next year and abysmal without he and Burke in a major hypothetical world.
If the Jazz keep him, I'd leave the 4 year, $32 million deal on the table and have Gobert, Favors, Hayward, Jingles/Hood/Millsap and Exum all start. Enes probably signs the QO at that point and then I'd focus on getting the most out of him for the team's needs, which is as a big scorer off the bench. They trade him now, or they keep him the rest of this year and next.I think the Kanter situation will be similar to the trade deadline when we thought Millsap and/or Jefferson would be traded but nothing ended up happening.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nba/suns/2015/02/17/goran-dragic-suns/23591221/
We can offer what he is looking for as far as the role he would play on the team. As long as he is willing to wait until next year on the playoff competitor thing... Lakers and Rockets getting a lot of buzz but why be in the shadow of Kobe or Harden? He could be option 1B on this team and take the ball up the court every single play.
We strengthen our ability to sign him long-term if we use Kanter to pick up additional assets now.
Dragic should be an offseason project, if at all.
What is the reasoning here? Like having Lamb or Perry Jones would make him choose Utah over L.A.?We strengthen our ability to sign him long-term if we use Kanter to pick up additional assets now.