Brunson I could understand, but why would Barrett not be thrilled?I wonder how RJ barret feels about all these trade rumors of mitchell? must not be too thrilled.
I understand how the deal would work, I just don’t think it makes sense to the Knicks to swap Rose for Beverley if it’s not necessary - and I don’t think it is. I think Beverley has more value somewhere else and should end up in a different deal.Oh, I'm saying it would be a stipulation of the deal.
For example - Don goes for Fournier, Grimes, McBride and a load of picks. In a separate deal, Beverley goes for Rose.
Not happening imoI want 6 1st rounders + Toppin, Grimes, Fournier and maybe a swap. Flip Fournier
What did you have for dinner last night?Not happening imo
You might be right, and Thibs is a fan of Rose.I understand how the deal would work, I just don’t think it makes sense to the Knicks to swap Rose for Beverley if it’s not necessary - and I don’t think it is. I think Beverley has more value somewhere else and should end up in a different deal.
I think Beverley gets packaged with another player and shipped out as soon as he can aggregate unless someone offers a protected 1st for just him. No reason to think he’ll stay in Utah this year. Just seems like a temporary stop for him imo.You might be right, and Thibs is a fan of Rose.
I just see Beverley being a smart pick up for NY if they are trying to take this young team to the next level. He surely has no place in Utah with what we're doing.