MDAV28
Well-Known Member
I'm with ya. I don't think these three games prove that the jazz will have the best defense when the season is all said and done
Soooo the 79 PPG is not all you need?
I'm with ya. I don't think these three games prove that the jazz will have the best defense when the season is all said and done
I'm hoping the Pacers continue to suck and they decide to blow it up and trade us George Hill.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
Soooo the 79 PPG is not all you need?
I think he's saying we will not hold teams to an average of 79ppg over the course of a season.
I mean why not? Because you have to consider opponents, pace, etc. So you have to look outside the 79 PPG number.
Most likely no, never. To have such fluidity isn't just repetition starting age 24.. There is a talent there, honed through time. No if Gobert can have a decent hook shot to 6/8 feet that would be tops. if he can shoot FTs at 65% or more + learns how to become an aggressive roll player, thant he will go all the way up to 15ppg almost organically I think.
We'd have him for two seasons, and if he decides to leave in FA, Exum should be ready to take over by then. I think acquiring Hill would vastly improve the PG play this year and next year for relatively cheap (8 mill per). Hopefully he'd be willing to stay as Exum's future long term back up, but if not, having a legit PG through 2017 would still be worth it IMO. Him being a UFA relatively soon is part of what makes him acquirable, and his contract fits nicely with Exum's timetable of development.I could see this as a real possibility. The one concern is that he is an unrestricted FA after next season.. Don't think DL gives up much value for someone we project to be a veteran backup and may only be here two to one-half seasons.
Sure, but I think his point stands. If the Jazz were able to keep teams to 79ppg over the course of the season we would have a historically good defensive team and we would be a top team in the league, no doubt. The 79ppg would be a very good indication that the other defensive metrics would also be good. It doesn't tell you exactly what those other numbers would be, but they couldn't be bad if we held teams to 79ppg.
We'd have him for two seasons, and if he decides to leave in FA, Exum should be ready to take over by then. I think acquiring Hill would vastly improve the PG play this year and next year for relatively cheap (8 mill per). Hopefully he'd be willing to stay as Exum's future long term back up, but if not, having a legit PG through 2017 would still be worth it IMO. Him being a UFA relatively soon is part of what makes him acquirable, and his contract fits nicely with Exum's timetable of development.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
Ya it is. So far 79 ppg is enough to tell me we have had one of the best defenses in the league so far.Soooo the 79 PPG is not all you need?