Jazz May Be A Part of 3-Team Deal w/ Clippers

[BabyPeterzz]

Gotta go with Nerd and logic on this one.

Plus UJ107 agreed with the George Hill lovers.

Yer team, dudes.

 

[NUMBERICA]

If Millsap isn't willing to re-up with the Jazz and back up Favors, then he's not really in the longer term plans either. But this is another topic.

If.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

This thread took a turn for the suck.

For once I'm not in the middle of a really pointless argument.

 

[Julie Greengiant]

guess who waved the towel for collison at the end of playoff games.

Not George Hill because he was on the court.

 

[GVC]

ok, current PER: harris still wins, 17 to 15.

Did you pull those numbers out of your ***? 16.08 to 15.77 in favor of Harris this season (17 to 10 in favor of Hill in the playoffs). Throw in age, role and contract, and...

 

[theNBAnerd]

When I think someone's an idiot, I tell them. I don't just hint at it. That would make me a slimy ****ing weasel.

And the way you use "facts" is ridiculous. I thought you were above that sort of nonsense. Viny should be here to demand intellectual honesty.

And this is where we disagree. Harris is not more than a role player, and he's not a role player. He's not worth keeping on beyond next season. Hill might be. I imagine that's true for many (most?) teams.

Opinions can vary on this one. Far from common sense. You'd have to be a complete ****ing moron to think otherwise.

the argument isn't who would we rather have on the jazz. the argument began as does harris command a better market price than hill did last year? and yes, that answer is common sense.

 

[NUMBERICA]

they were default all-stars because of injuries. devin got in by averaging 20+ ppg and posting a top-20 PER in the league that year. he also was the second-best player on an NBA finalist. you can get more for him than pavel podkolzine and a bag of doritos.

That year.

 

[Dr. Jones]

For once I'm not in the middle of a really pointless argument.

Prove it.

 

[Saint Cy of JFC]

Prove it.

You are a bad fisherman.

 

[UGLI baby]

the argument isn't who would we rather have on the jazz. the argument began as does harris command a better market price than hill did last year? and yes, that answer is common sense.

If he did, his *** would've been traded yesterday.

 

[theNBAnerd]

Did you pull those numbers out of your ***? 16.0 to 15.7 in favor of Harris. Throw in age, role and contract, and...

this is my favorite misconception. harris is 29, hill is 26. it's not like we're talking about derek fisher vs. john wall here.

and my bad on the PER numbers. i was working from memory.

 

[Dr. Jones]

You are a bad fisherman.

No, I'm a good fisherman .. because now you are most definitely in the middle of a very pointless debate.