What's new
By:

Jazz May Be A Part of 3-Team Deal w/ Clippers

He's definitely a decent player and that is what makes this appealing to me. If we get any additional assets it's a bonus, but just Mo for nothing isn't half bad.
 
It's not Mo for "nothing", it's Mo for rented cap space. I don't think Mo's value equals the rented cap space so they should get something back in the form of a pick or cash. A 1st is unlikely, but a 2nd should be a given. THEN being able to aggressively shop Harris should be an ancillary benefit, not the sum benefit of acquiring Mo.
 
Actually, I think CBA rules require we get back at least a 2nd. So really, it should be better than the usual Future 2019 2nd rounder, and something a little juicier.
 
Would love to have Mo back. And I doubt it means we are not trying to move up to draft a PG. Either way having Mo for a year is great.
 
billyshelby said:
It's not Mo for "nothing", it's Mo for rented cap space. I don't think Mo's value equals the rented cap space so they should get something back in the form of a pick or cash. A 1st is unlikely, but a 2nd should be a given. THEN being able to aggressively shop Harris should be an ancillary benefit, not the sum benefit of acquiring Mo.
Click to expand...
All I'm saying is that our cap space THIS YEAR was not likely a huge asset, and this is a pretty good use of it, especially if we bring in an additional draft pick.
 
i think this is a great pick up for the TE. IMO, this could be the signal that another move could be down the line, perhaps packaging Harris with Al or Paul? Could that be the GS trade that PKM was talking about for the #7? Inquiring minds want to know...
 
It will definitely improve our team a little, but Mo isn't taking the Jazz to a different level or anything. But I say what the hell go for it.
 
The real question is, given Mo's contract situation, why are we interested in a one-year rental of a 30 year old point guard?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top