Yeah, pretty much nailed it. I really hate the precedent that this sets probably more than anything, but it is what it is.People keep saying we should have used the cap space to absorb contracts and acquire picks...
I think a GSW trade like last year is going to be less likely for the next couple of years because so many teams have cap space.
Something we could possibly do now though is in a couple years trade Hayward to a contender, take back a similar but underperforming contract, and also receive an asset in the process. Obviously that requires a pretty specific scenario, but it is not out of the question at all.
I think people are really losing sight of the fact that Gordon Hayward is first and foremost a good basketball player and valuable to the team on the court, but also it is absurd to think he all of the sudden is some un tradable asset that is going to cost us numerous "cap rental" type of deals.
I didn't want us to match, but I'm also not gonna go full Artard and pretend like there isn't a lot of positives about keeping a young, really good player on our team.