What's new

JD Vance

Apparently, had he lived in the 1850’s, Vance would likely be a member of the Nativist Party, aka the Know Nothing Party, aka the American Party….Regressive and reactionary to the core….


In another resurfaced clip, Republican vice-presidential candidate JD Vance made a bold statement about US crime rates, blaming immigrants from Ireland.

The clip from 2021, which has been circulating on X, shows Vance speaking in a Skype interview. He discussed early waves of immigration to the United States, pointing out the ‘rise in crime’ he felt ensued as a consequence.
"You had this massive wave of Italian, Irish and German immigration,” Vance said, “and that had its problems, its consequences. You had higher crime rates, you had these ethnic enclaves, you had inter-ethnic conflict in the country where you really hadn't had that before”

The Republicans represent reactionary and regressive attitudes. Had Vance lived in the 1850’s, when the Know Nothings elected members to Congress, he might have been their presidential candidate:


“By the 1850s, however, that small stream of immigrants had grown into a mighty river: famine and revolution in Europe drove unprecedented numbers of immigrants to American shores. More than five times as many people immigrated to the United States in 1854 than in 1844, and most of the new immigrants were poor, Catholic laborers from Ireland or Germany. By 1860, more than 13% of U.S. inhabitants had been born elsewhere. Because the new immigrants were disproportionately young adults, their impact on the ballot box was even more pronounced. [2] Some native-born Americans began to fear that the existing laws governing and voting rights were too generous toward newcomers. A political cartoon from the 1850s expressed the sentiment that these new immigrants—considered too drunken and violent to wield political power wisely—were poised to “steal” American elections, depicting caricatures of Irish and German men carrying away the ballot box.”

Vance would have approved of this political cartooon. He’s a man from another time….

IMG_4744.jpeg
My own Irish immigrant ancestors fought and died on the side of the Union in the Civil War. The above cartoon was BS in the 1850’s, and 170+ years later, it’s still BS when Vance, astonishingly, repeats it. A man out of time, out of place, and hopefully out of luck…..
 
Last edited:


"Senator JD Vance has made yet another joke that backfired.

Vance was speaking in Kenosha, Wisconsin on Tuesday morning when a reporter asked how he is preparing to debate Governor Tim Walz on October 1.

“Well, I found a good friend from back home who embellishes and lies a lot, I’m having him stand in for Tim Walz,” Vance responded.

But the insult quickly backfired as several social media users joked Vance was referencing Donald Trump, who has become notorious for lying over everything from election results and crowd sizes to the weather. The Washington Post estimated that during his presidency he made more than 30,000 false or misleading statements.

“Nice of Trump to help Vance with debate prep,” author and Jeopardy! Champion Hemant Mehta wrote.

The Lincoln Project, an anti-Trump Republican organization, posted a photo of the former president with the caption, “The friend.”
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MVP
JD's already piss-poor popularity heading down:





"JD Vance's unpopularity is in the double digits, with a +10 unfavorability on a polling average site for the first time.

The Ohio Senator has had a difficult time in the polls since Donald Trump announced he was the Republican Vice Presidential candidate in July.

This seems to be changing in some polls, with the most recent Morning Consult research showing that voters are now only two points more likely to have unfavorable than favorable views of Vance.


Nevertheless, polling aggregation site FiveThirtyEight has unfavorable opinions of Vance at 43.2 percent and favorable opinions of him at 33.2 percent.

This is a net difference of 10 percentage points, the first time it has been in the double digits on FiveThirtyEight since Vance entered the race.

FiveThirtyEight's results, the most recent of which were updated on Wednesday, are based on a projection of 95 percent of polls falling in that range.

Newsweek has contacted Vance's team via email for comment.

Just a few days ago, when Vance was asked about his reaction to the polls in general at a campaign event in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, he said he did not believe the polls and was focused on other things."
 
JD's already piss-poor popularity heading down:





"JD Vance's unpopularity is in the double digits, with a +10 unfavorability on a polling average site for the first time.

The Ohio Senator has had a difficult time in the polls since Donald Trump announced he was the Republican Vice Presidential candidate in July.

This seems to be changing in some polls, with the most recent Morning Consult research showing that voters are now only two points more likely to have unfavorable than favorable views of Vance.


Nevertheless, polling aggregation site FiveThirtyEight has unfavorable opinions of Vance at 43.2 percent and favorable opinions of him at 33.2 percent.

This is a net difference of 10 percentage points, the first time it has been in the double digits on FiveThirtyEight since Vance entered the race.

FiveThirtyEight's results, the most recent of which were updated on Wednesday, are based on a projection of 95 percent of polls falling in that range.

Newsweek has contacted Vance's team via email for comment.

Just a few days ago, when Vance was asked about his reaction to the polls in general at a campaign event in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, he said he did not believe the polls and was focused on other things."
The modern right wing movement is shocked to see normal people think they are complete losers
 
The modern right wing movement believes anything and everything contradicting what they believe about themselves is the result of a mass left wing conspiracy.
This

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
“give me glazed”

lol of course of course… lol

So cringe


View: https://x.com/philipjgermain/status/1826666886823903288?s=46


How long have you worked here? Okay.
Man that was weird.

I thought it was pretty funny when he is like "im running for vice president" probably expecting her to be impressed or something. Her response? "Ok"

Also kind of a subtle plug for the Biden administration when he asked her how long the place had been around and she said "about 4 years"

So not only did the country not fall apart when Biden won the election but apparently the owner of this donut shop decided it was a good time to start a new business.

Go Vance Go, you ****ing weirdo

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Man that was weird.

I thought it was pretty funny when he is like "im running for vice president" probably expecting her to be impressed or something. Her response? "Ok"

Also kind of a subtle plug for the Biden administration when he asked her how long the place had been around and she said "about 4 years"

So not only did the country not fall apart when Biden won the election but apparently the owner of this donut shop decided it was a good time to start a new business.

Go Vance Go, you ****ing weirdo

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Hahaha really good point. Sorta undermines the current Trump attack that we’re in a new Great Depression and World War III combined right now
 

Sen. JD Vance, the Republican Party’s vice presidential nominee, mocked the idea this week that Vice President Kamala Harris “wants to build the border wall.” Hours later, GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham appeared on Fox News and told viewers, “Graham: Do you really believe she’s going to build a wall? That’s just bulls---.”

As for what prompted the partisan pushback, it apparently stems from a report Axios published. The headline read, “Harris flip-flops on building the border wall,” and the article began:

If she’s elected president, Kamala Harris pledges to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on the wall along the southern border — a project she once opposed and called “un-American” during the Trump administration. It’s the latest example of Harris flip-flopping....
A typical person reading this might believe that the Democratic presidential hopeful recently endorsed investing in a border wall, but that’s not quite what happened.


Let’s take a brief stroll down memory lane.

Democrats, left with little choice, agreed to pay the GOP’s ransom and endorsed a conservative, bipartisan compromise. At that point, Republicans killed the compromise plan they’d demanded — largely because Donald Trump told them to.

What does this have to do with allegations of Harris “flip-flopping”? The bipartisan compromise, which featured concessions from both parties, included some wall funding in the hopes of generating GOP support. It was a relatively modest sum — $650 million, roughly 3% of what the Trump administration sought in 2018 — and the funding wasn’t even new. (As Team Harris reminded Axios, the provision “just extended the timeline to spend funds that had been appropriated during Trump’s last year as president.”)


The vice president has never been a wall advocate — in fact, she’s been a fierce critic of Trump’s plan — but she endorsed the Senate agreement in the hopes of getting something done on the issue.

Six months after Republicans killed the deal they requested, using Harris' convention speech as a news hook, Axios summarized this in bullet-point form, at which point the right effectively declared, “A ha!”

As lines of attack go, this is weak tea. If the Democratic nominee were to actually endorse the merits of a border wall, that would be a dramatic reversal worthy of attention. But her willingness to back a bipartisan compromise — which included provisions she and her party would not support on their own — does not a “flip-flop” make.
 
I think @Elizah Huge should probably read this as I think he is confused about the topic.

I guess since trump killed the bipartisan border legislation proposal a few months back then he is against the border wall now and is also a flip flopper since that legislation included funding for the border wall.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
And this another fabrication being made about the Harris waltz tandem.


The intended takeaway was that Walz somehow lied about the identity of his dog, Scout, by describing two different dogs as his beloved pet in separate X posts. Social media users shared screenshots of the posts as alleged proof that the Minnesota governor exhibits a pattern of deceit, garnering thousands of likes, shares and reactions across platforms.

In one post, from June 2022, Walz is pictured hugging a black dog. The caption reads, “Sending a special birthday shoutout to our favorite pup, Scout.” The other, posted in October 2022, showed Walz beside a brown and white dog with the caption: “Couldn’t think of a better way to spend a beautiful fall day than at the dog park. I know Scout enjoyed it.”

In response, Walz supporters shared posts on social media showing that Walz was simply playing with someone else's dog while mentioning Scout in the caption.

So, @Elizah Huge, if you read something about Walz lying about his dog just know it's not true. Just more false info like the info you got about about Harris being pro border wall.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
Just more false info like the info you got about about Harris being pro border wall.
Is that false? She made a point of including support for it in a speech. I'm aware of the MSNBC article trying to spin it as support for a defunct piece of legislation but I've not heard anything from the candidate to clarify Kamala's actual position. Maybe a reporter should ask her except that Kamala doesn't answer questions from anyone about anything so you have no idea if the info is false or not.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top